Damn imagine paying to read an article to confirm your biases. If you’re going to claim something is a bubble you need to claim something more specific than “AI”.

The entire early modern web was a bubble in the early 00s and it’s still here. There’s not even many large companies yet to even start being bubbly. An actual AI bubble could be 10 years off.

I just love how so many educated and intelligent people can get stuck in knee jerk reactionary takes because some admittedly large aspects of a new technology (LLMs) are annoying as hell.

They’ll make a new entity that extracts most of the profit while the production facility operates at cost or even a loss. Jurisdiction shopping is a thing even within the US.

Windows 11 doing this is more ewaste not less. It’s more ewaste even if 100% of the existing stock gets reused because some (many?) of those computers will get replaced with new ones.

Which static site hosters do this?

Ohh yeah the popular and highly desirable thing that people are willing to pay a premium for won’t catch on!

Alls I’m saying is you’re an idiot and it’s time to stop.

There was definitely a time when python3 was not recommended and plenty of scripts weren’t yet differentiating between the two. Everything was breaking back then.

Brilliant deduction. I’m sure you’re very smart. One day you might learn that being smart and being correct are not mutually inclusive.

You got confused. You’re an anti-theist as in against theism. Atheism simply means without theism. Anyways happy I could clear that up for you. Try to be nicer in the future.

Japan’s entire system is privatized no?

I am not a younger generation and am not being sarcastic. Body shaming men is just generally accepted but it’s not okay to do that to anyone. There are plenty of other equally rude and more accurate ways to say someone is an insecure asshole. We should use them.

Obviously not (yet?) available in the US but other countries have much smaller trucks with larger beds. https://www.kia.com/dm/showroom/K2700-2022/specification.html

That plus a 2200 lb hauling capacity make them a very capable, efficient, and reasonably safe truck.

Nahh that’s misandrist and body shaming. This definition is better.

Fatalities are one thing to consider. Another is injuries that can range from minor to life changing.

I don’t know the stats on this but pedestrian injuries would be something for policy makers to consider as well.

And in general:

• If deaths are up it’s safe to assume injuries are up as well
• Good policy making also involves preventing problems, and educating people on the issue. If 0.2% of deaths is acceptable and trending up at what point do we take action? 0.5%? 1%? 5%?

I don’t think that the US even tracks injuries at least I can’t find anything from a cursory search. But according to Vancouver RTOR is 13% of all deaths and serious injuries. https://viewpointvancouver.ca/2022/08/23/rethinking-the-right-turn-on-red/

deleted by creator

Harm reduction is a thing though

You have to be pretty narrow minded and inexperienced to not be capable of imagining a situation where a massive pothole is unavoidable.

Only the NYTs could look at all the pro-fossil fuel insanity that has come out of this conference and say “ackshually, it’s good”. What a trash rag.

Probably liability

Trying to redefine antisemitism while being antisemitic yourself isn’t going to fly well.

“Jews get a word because of all their propaganda” is like basic, run of the mill antisemitism.