3 is overpowered, it’s basically FTL if the reload time is low

didnt baby gronk get rizzed up like last year?

17 and a half weeks

they tax people too, they just hide it behind tarrifs

on economic policy, the two parties aren’t too different

primary em

I highly doubt that Iran would attack the US directly - the most they would do is cyberwar

the US has the military power to force Farsi to become a dead language, and I don’t think the Iranian government would want to mess with force that powerful like that

I think what your seeing is probably a bunch of coincidences, there’s other explainations for that stuff you listed, like trump replacing govt workers with his own or wanting more deregulation for power plants.

I wouldn’t worry too much of a threat like that from Iran.

road that leads directly to civil war

I highly doubt its going to lead to that. The vast majority people are too lazy to fight for anything and would much rather stare at their phones all day. And every sane person knows war is hell so they don’t want that.

I remember that

kys

keep yourself save

if its a prison the people are breaking out of, its a prison break

This is a very complex and intricate topic and it really isn’t simple at all and it takes large amounts of mental effort to comprehend its mechanics.

in some sense everyone reading this is rich on the global scale of wealth

the one I’m on is pretty nice

betting markets that try to predict the actions of a single person are so rigged and people shouldn’t put any money into them unless they want to influence the persons decision

like if there was a market where people were betting if I would say a given word one day and the odds were 99%-1%, with the 99% being that I would say it, I would bet on the 1% that I wouldn’t, and then not say it. in this way those people who bet that I would say it, they were actually paying me in a sense for me to not say it

betting markets that try to predict the actions of a single person are so rigged and people shouldn’t put any money into them unless they want to influence the persons decision

like if there was a market where people were betting if I would say a given word one day and the odds were 99%-1%, with the 99% being that I would say it, I would bet on the 1% that I wouldn’t, and then not say it. in this way those people who bet that I would say it, they were actually paying me in a sense for me to not say it

average .ml take

IrAn DoEsNt EvEn WaNt NuKeS

nuclear powers can still have wars between them

think India vs Pakistan

Is Iran having a nuclear weapon worse then Trump having acces to a nuclear weapon.

that’s a dumb questions and I’m gonna be blunt about it

it is clear that the US will not use nukes on a country because of MAD - mutually assured destruction, if they also have nukes then both sides will suffer vast loses, making nukes an unthinkable option. However the extent that MAD would affect Iran’s decision making remains unknown, because using suicide bombers isn’t a new idea for them.

yeah that makes sense, like a math proof

2+2 is a fact

In some sense, if every single human thought that 2+2 equaled 5, it would become true

(I’m not smart enough to come up with this lol, got it from Orwell’s 1984)