¯\_(ツ)_/¯

But, done of us like to be used :(

You don’t expect OP to understand this?

Maybe if he shakes his head fast left and right, those two braincells could touch for a second, but I consider the chances pretty slim

Can confirm, would fuck the whole Lucifer cast.

I don’t say the code isn’t sloppy and should never go live I. It’s state.

I say: show me the app on the app store that you can download and use.

We are talking about security issues in a reference implementation.

We are not talking about an app. All this does is to spread fear and if this whole thing is not accepted by the Public because of this , what then? We land up in a privatisation scenario once again and then fuck privacy.

This state of the Codebase is fixable, but stop talking about it like it would be a released app. It is not.

Ok, once again in slow: each country must implement their own app.

One for Germany, one for France and so on. Because it has to be tied into the ID card system of the country.

You can build the app in the repo but the app can not do any age verification without this integration. I even cited the fucking sentence from the readme.

We are getting somewhere. So a bunch of devs develop an SDK, and some demo implementations. No country adopted the app yet, there is no version that works, as there is no version by an ID card authority.

It does not matter what Ursel said, there is no app. There is only an SDK.

And to then the press talks about “the App”. Why would one add such a node in the first place? Only because of this reporting.

https://github.com/eu-digital-identity-wallet/av-app-android-wallet-ui#important-note

The current version is not feature complete and will require further integration work before production deployment. In particular, any national-specific enrolment procedures must be implemented by the respective Member States or publishing parties.

First sentence in the GitHub readme

The demo version is being updated. We will continue to release updates on the demo versions for community testing.

And once again: each country has to implement its own app. This version is just a technology demo and indented to be tested, hacked and reviewed

Edit : forgot the link to the repo https://github.com/eu-digital-identity-wallet/av-app-android-wallet-ui

This is the 20ies post I see about this.

And the 10th times I will say it:

This is a prototype release. This is not a production ready release. It demos the integration. Each country will build their own app.

Not Germany ffs. Friedrich Merz is not Germany, as Donald Trump is not the USA.

Nope. Courts decided: AI output is never copyrightable.

I though a while if i should answer to it. And this is so wrong, and dangerous, that i decided to do.

First: Such licensing questions are part of my day to day Job. I will explain it to you like i explain it to first semester students:

A LICENSE defines the terms under which a copyrighted work can be used, distributed and so on. It does not matter what the work is. A few relevant examples:

• Beats: in the music industry there is a market for beats. If you take a 10 second beat and in-cooperate it in your own music without having a license for it, you are in violation of copyright law.
• Paintings: You can not have a copyright on the concept of using paint to draw pictures on a piece of linen, you can not have a copyright on the concept of a specific object drawn on linen. You can have copyright on YOUR version of it. If somebody else takes your work, and only modifies it slightly (or for example, include it into a book, that is a copyright-able piece of work), without having a license for it… copyright violation

So, this brings us back to our topic:

There is no difference between sourcecode, music, paintings or writings for the purpose of licensing.

So, as courts established, AI CAN NOT BE CREATIVE and ALWAYS based on other works. Therefore any AI generated Work is in itself are not protected by copyright.

So, EVERY piece of code that is AI generated is free to go for any purpose, it does not fucking matter if there is a GPL 3.0 header in the file. AI Generated == Public domain.

But: Projects use viral copyleft licenses for a reason. A company could just take the AI generated code, implement it, and if somebody has a problem with it an just shrug “It’s AI generated, it’s public domain”.

So, by your logic I take the kernel source, or parts of it and use them verbatim in my property project?

You can see yourself that you are talking bullshit?

Or course code is and was licensable. Because code is more then hast if, else, for, while.

Ever seen that some code in some projects is dual licensed?

Why would anyone need this if only while projects are licensable?

https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/collection/eupl/licence-compatibility-permissivity-reciprocity-and-interoperability

Ok, so, someone used an LLM do create changes. This new code is no longer under the project license it is, as you say, public domain.

Move forward 400 commits. At what point is most of the code public domain?

While correct you still missed the point completely.

So,not make this as clear as possible: You can not license LLM generated code. Not under GPL, z lib or other copyleft licenses. It may work with public domain licenses.

For MIT licensed projects there is not a big issue.

For the kernel, have a look at the rules. AI models may assist only.

I can’t see that. Yes, the press is hyping Mythos in a complete brainless way, without understanding what the Mythos paper says.

But just following the statements made by Anthropic that is a clear and factual representation.

I actually recommend that people read the paper itself. And not just die cherry picked parts of the press.

Also, I have seen 3 reported 0days found by Mythos in projects I (or my employer) contributes.

That is not hype, those found issues are fact.

If You made it to here in the comment, a little bonus. Let us debunk some press statements

• Press: Mythos cheated, lied and is dangerous.

• Fact: earlier versions did this. Anthropic describes the preview version as the most aligned model they have ever created, and cheating occured in less then 1% of cases

• Press: Mythos is a security nightmare

• Fact: in the wrong hands, it could be.

• Press: Mythos exploited Firefox!

• Fact: yes and no. It founds zero day’s in Firefox, but the extremely high success rate where an instrumented JS environment, and not the full browser

Looking at AusweisApp2, just works.

And, is there already a 1.0 release of the new App or is this still pre release?

Gentoo. Use Gentoo and keep your sanity

Tomorrow, I will pick up a second, empty, work notebook. I am part of a small group that implements a user driven Linux support in our 6k employee group.

We will make it more then a week, I promise :)

At least i am now aware

It’s HDR. It’s both.