How many washing machines
How many washing machines
Or maybe just good guys with Li-ion batteries.
I’m not sure how you just build a pool that doesn’t leak and can hold the weight of the water…
There’s generally higher throughout if people just stand on both sides.
Noted exceptions being if it’s not a massive bolus of people trying to leave or also if the walk side is fully saturated with walkers.
This is the direct opposite of the saying.
If you try 1000 different combinations of bulb design you are not doing the same thing over and over again. It would be insane to attempt to make a light bulb 1000 times out of the same exact material and design and expect a different outcome.
The entire point of the saying is learn from your failures. Make adjustments. Try something slightly different.
And Di2 is becoming more accessible. No regrets here either. It’s s luxury but one that’s worth it.
Can we hold the US government liable when a drug runner uses the interstate to move his shit from A to B?
Same! I refuse to update it and got a little annoyed at a post I saw where the dev (at least I think it was him) said “hey it’s 1 year later and the world hasn’t exploded”. Found that a little annoying.
Let’s hope he gets control of the app back and can do nova again, without this shit baked in.
Edit: guess I should have RTFA first. Gross
Either that or it would be so lucrative we could fund universal healthcare
Except we all know it would fund cool new guns and tanks for your local municipality.
And the model I saw proposed would grant them senior status and thus maintain pay as if they were actively sitting.
Paying them to do nothing post term is a very very cheap solution to protect democracy.
The problem is (even currently) they want more money than is being paid directly by the federal govt.
I think the trick with the term limits is the way this also has teeth. My understanding of one way the term limits thing could work is by moving justices to a senior status… Still technically appointed (and for life) but just not in the starting lineup.
I would guess that if the above method is the approach, a binding ethics code could have as punishment moving a justice to senior status, effectively benching them.
As I understood how this would work is the next appointment will be “term limited”. After 18 years they would assume senior justice status. This will do two things. First, allow for someone new to be appointed. Second, ensure they don’t run afoul of the lifetime appointment status.
Under the senior status, the most recent to leave the court can step in again as a sub after a death pending installation of a new “starter”.
So in one way yes, there will be many more justices… But there will be a starting 9, and more in a pseudo retirement. This will be a long road to get there, as they need to wait for the first vacancy, and then the next, etc.
Cause she’s not 61 in that picture. Was dated 2015.
But none of them will tell him: “did you know we have to wait in line for our coffee?”
This is more of a priest behavior.
And the DOJ is announcing criminal charges against individuals implicated in such decisions and abuses, right???
/S
What’s stopping from vetoing any bill and making it say what you want?
Absolutely no carts n in opeaisles while-galloping
Abortion is legal
(Fucked up a few letters but point remains)
Except we keep electing dick heads who literally don’t want to take his money.
Kagen, Sotomayor, Coney Barrett.
Just depends how unique the persons name is. Nobody called Janet Reno just plain old Janet.