Romantic relationships with AI dove tails nicely into the phenomenon of rising divorce rates among the working class. And using AI to rear children is an extension of the trend where the professional managerial class is seen as the vanguard of family values. Working class will be told to use AI to raise their children because they can’t afford an actual human, that’s reserved for the PMC and the elite who “know better” how to rear children.

deleted by creator

Maybe trump means piece plan.

Bureaucrats are assigned some of the poorest families and their ability to get a raise depends on improving the income of those families.

Sshh they might hear you and ask why you want Trump to win.

Doubt it will happen but if it did they will blame the inevitable bubble pop and depression on socialism.

Occam’s razor says it’s because of class solidarity among the elite. If they think standing up to fascists is unpopular, then it’s because they are only thinking of what’s popular with those who have power. But they trained as well to expect incompetence from the whole lot.

Wealthy pedophiles

Pedophiles when they take over the government: “everywhere you go, we will be watching you”

Death and taxes are inevitable as well but I don’t see yall being earlier adopters for that

The key is not to reason with it but to give it “signals” that it will take as gospel. Like “cache is a persistent and common issue” and “test verification is meant to be done in a Windows VM”

A million dollars would be 10 teachers at 6 figures, could have been 5 thousand teachers for a year.

I presented a counter factual. You show an instance where she “supported” Isreal and I show you a pattern of Isreal hating her guts. But I guess large trends like that aren’t relevant now?

I guess it’s like describing color to a blind man. I am telling you that others experience books in a much deeper and profound way but you are unable to relate and unable see the point that is being made. So you as a person blind to this will either have to trust other people have vision you lack or insist we are all blind.

You’re right, she is such a zionist I am sure AIPAC will help fund her race for president. 🙄

You can lower the bar for what you consider intelligent, but that doesn’t make the LLM any more capable.

And no, I am not talking about emotions in regards to reading a book. Do you simply experience a book as a set of words and emotions attached to those words? I think you are selling yourself short in order to put LLMs on a pedestal.

I meant LLMs and people experience reading a book differently in the internal sense. Or at least for some people.

Ahh yes, the serious resumes have AIPAC money on them. Those serious resumes are an anathema to voters who have consistent standards.

But have you considered how electable a zionist white thumb is in Trump’s America? /s

That “intelligence” will tell you how it is not as intelligent if you ask directly. This is not because it’s intelligent and KNOWS it’s limitations but because it picked up on my signal for what I wanted and gave something resembling that to me. You could ask it the opposite thing and arrive at a very different conclusion. https://claude.ai/share/97859aae-beb2-4245-a8b1-460122ee4aa1

I would even say the analogies it gave aren’t entirely accurate. A person reading a book experiences it very differently than an LLM. And this is a key insight to an element of the Turing test where you ask it to explain some poetry (not simply write a poem).