• @rglullisOPA
    link
    English
    18 months ago

    There is always a cap.

      • @rglullisOPA
        link
        English
        18 months ago

        “IPFS” can not have a cap, because IPFS is not a service provider. IPFS is a protocol.

        • @Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          Fair enough.

          So the IPFS network has a cap. Like OVH doesn’t have a cap as it’s a company, but their network does.

          • @rglullisOPA
            link
            English
            18 months ago

            Are you trying to really understand how the thing works, or are you just looking for ways to dismiss the thing so that you can remain ignorant about it.

            We’re talking about data transmission caps (as in, 1TB/month), not in bandwidth (as in 800MB/s) Also, IPFS is a protocol. The “cap” of the network is only theoretically bound by the amount of nodes running in it, but in practice it doesn’t really matter because the bandwidth of any single node will always end up being the real bottleneck.

            • @Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              08 months ago

              I’m not trying to dismiss this thing, but I see not very many usecases for it. That’s why I ask all those questions and the answers are not really fulfilling IMO.

              BTW 800Mb/s is sure a cap too in its way, a 100MB/s is just that, capped on one second instead of a month.