Leaked Microsoft memo tells managers not to use budget cuts as an explainer for lack of pay rises: ‘Reinforce that every year offers unique opportunity for impact’::Managers are being ordered to dodge employees’ questions about how the latest budget cuts will impact their pay.

  • jtk@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Every corp knows we’re in late stage capitalism. They’re not even trying to hide it anymore. Any individual that makes a billion dollars should be viewed as an enemy, even millionaires should be very nervous.

    • Blastasaurus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      What - you can’t even buy a nice two-bedroom condo here for a million dollars, I think you need to re-evaluate what a millionaire is today.

      • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Buying a million dollar house and being a millionaire are two different things. Multi millionaires are part of the problem as well.

      • PickTheStick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I took it to mean people who earn that much per year. The average person working a $30k+ job should have more than a million in the bank at retirement, and that should have been enough to retire on comfortably. Now I’m being told it’s more than 1.5-2 million dollars at retirement.

    • Vent@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      You pretty much need to be a multimillionaire to retire these days and it’s not that hard to do with a half decent job and basic retirement planning, especially when factoring in a home to your net worth (which is standard). Millionaires are not the enemy. $1m is 1000x closer to $0 than $1B.

    • Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The same late stage capitalism we’ve been in since the term was coined 175 years ago?

      • jtk@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Later in the stage? The term was coined before the stage happened. End of WWI was supposedly the start and I don’t think the idea was that it would implode the instance the stage was hit. We got a bit of a bounce back with the tech boom, that’s clearly over. Unless another major frontier pops up that isn’t immediately sucked dry by the already rich, we’re at the end.