• BoscoBear@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      And trains aren’t stuck to roads. And planes aren’t stuck to roads. And ships aren’t stuck to roads.

    • torpak@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      cars are stuck to roads and much less efficient everywhere many people need to go. cars are basically useful where only few people live or work.

        • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          If you can’t conveniently travel by train, that is a failure of the design of your city, not trains. If the destination a train took you to was walkable you wouldn’t need a car, because the train could cover the large distances, and you could simply walk from the train to your necessary locations.

            • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              Sure, if we can build the infrastructure for cars there, why not trains too. You’re quite closed minded. But also, why can’t you just bike in a village? I mentioned cities because that’s where trains tend to be, genius.

              There’s trams, there’s bikes, there’s buses, etc. etc. etc.