What Biden has done is to cut the issuance of drilling leases to the minimum required by law, pass the Inflation Reduction Act, enact a regulation to force vehicle electrification, and similarly force fossil fuels out of most power plants.

What Biden has not done: stop issuing drilling permits or impose export restrictions on fossil fuels. The former has some serious limits because of how the courts treat the right to drill as a property right once you hold a drilling lease, and the latter is simply untested.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s stopping something trump tried to do from happening…

    It’s good, but we need to do a hell of a lot more than just sometimes stop things from getting worse.

    That’s pretty much the entire reason people don’t like moderates. Why wait decades to fix something instead of fixing stuff now?

    • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The graph from OPs link shows a significant drop off under Obama, a steep rise under trump, and then another drop off under Biden. Kind of follows the Dem-Rep seesaw I’ve been experience for decades. It’s depressing that the Dems can’t do more, but the reality is they are also funded by the deep pockets of the fossil fuel industry, Dems can barely hold onto majorities as it is, and voters vote for these morally weak candidates over and over. I’m really at a fuck-this-place, and fuck-all-these-people stage. The only thing I really regret is bringing a kid into this world. Just very selfish and narcissistic on my behalf.

      • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m really at a fuck-this-place, and fuck-all-these-people stage. The only thing I really regret is bringing a kid into this world. Just very selfish and narcissistic on my behalf.

        Can’t say I’ve ever related to a statement this hard for a while. It’s all just a shitshow and we seem to be at the “fuck it, let’s ramp this up to 11” stage of self-extermination.

        • vivadanang@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s all just a shitshow and we seem to be at the “fuck it, let’s ramp this up to 11” stage of self-extermination.

          meanwhile a third of the people are saying “oh we’ve got time, we just have to convince the people to come together and unify”

          and another third that’s saying “FUCK YOU I HAVE FIREARMS AND WILL ROLL COAL AS MUCH AS I WANT I WILL LITERALLY SPEW OIL! I AM ANGRY ALL THE TIME BECAUSE OF THE PAINT CHIPS AND LEADED FUEL EXPOSURE OF MY YOUTH AND ZERO HEALTHCARE INFRASTRUCTURE AND WILL PUNISH EACH AND EVERY OTHER HUMAN BEING WITH MY EFFLUENCE.”

          We’re stuck between kumbaya unity types and petrofascists meanwhile the world is COOKING.

          Meanwhile the Shell, Exxon & BP execs are just happy no one’s coming after them yet.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          and we seem to be at the “fuck it, let’s ramp this up to 11” stage of self-extermination.

          We do?

          Here in the United States the amount of electricity generated by coal burning has dropped by 50% in the last 20 years and in that same time frame renewable energy has more than doubled. Greenhouse Gas emissions per capita were lower in 2020 than they were in 2000 and we now generate more energy from renewables than we do from coal.

          https://usafacts.org/topics/energy/

          We can argue that the changeover to renewables isn’t happening fast enough but “fuck it, let’s ramp this up to 11” isn’t happening at all, it’s actually quite the opposite.

          • vivadanang@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            one part of the population is trying desperately to change the course, the other is rolling coal, opening new wells, spewing gigatons of methane from their fracking operations and standing around with their thumbs up their asses wondering why it’s so damned hot now that a dem is in office.

            the people trying to change the course won’t make a difference once the bus has gone off the cliffside mate.

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why wait decades to fix something instead of fixing stuff now?

      The United States is not a Command Economy and The President is not a Dictator. The US via private enterprise is dumping ever larger sums into renewable energy production and is definitely making progress. It’s not happening fast enough but it IS happening.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Moderates when something happens:

        We did this!

        Moderates when nothing happens:

        Don’t you know how the government works? We can’t do anything

        No one is demanding he succeed, we’re just asking that they fucking try.

        Bring stuff up for a vote and let people who see how their reps represent them.

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Republicans control the House of Representatives. Nothing can happen right now in the direction that we need as a result because zero of them will vote for it.

          The Inflation Reduction Act barely passed with Vice President Kamala Harris as a tiebreaking vote in the Senate because it was structured to fit within the budget reconciliation rules and therefore not subject to filibuster.

          It’s going to take a lot more Democrats in both the House and Senate before a moderate President can pass climate legislation. Even then, it’ll need to survive a court that’s hostile to the idea.

          • Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s really the fundamental issue, isn’t it? There is absolutely no democratic processes on the federal level. We get to pull a lever once every two years, and that is supposed to be a meaningful democratic participatory process.

              • Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t think that organizing within a private corporate party apparatus counts as participating in the democratic process more generally. Especially one that has admitted it has no obligation to follow its own rules. There needs to be a direct democratic process on a federal level. The majority of the population, regardless of party affiliation, support measures such as universal healthcare, but our process doesn’t empower collective change, rather it empowers minority interests over the majority, as evidenced by the legislation pushed and policy positions held by the federal government. Even good representatives can’t do anything because they’re hamstrung by an inherently partisan political process. Let the people speak. Where they are allowed to speak, we have seen big changes, (legalization of cannabis, ending of qualified immunity, bail reform, etc), but where the only avenue for change is through elected office, we have stagnated for decades behind the rest of the developed world.

                • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Organizing within the system is exactly how we’ve gotten as much as we have.

                  The alternative is to roll the dice with revolution, and that’s about as likely to end up in a much worse place than we’d otherwise get. That’s really only a rational choice when you don’t have other avenues to change policy.

                  • Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I suppose that depends on what era you’re referring to. It wasn’t working within the system that won the right to unionize, it was work outside the system that provided the necessary pressure to coerce concessions out of the government.

          • vivadanang@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nope, they could force it to a floor vote then contrast the dem’s votes to the rethuglican vote then compare the lobbying $ that goes to each.

            Put it to a vote then shame them. THE WORLD IS COOKING.

            • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              They can’t actually force a floor vote in the House because the Speaker there controls the schedule.

    • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s politically unpopular to do what need to be done. Moderate policies are popular policies. And moderate policies will move left the more people vote and the more old gens die.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s politically unpopular to do what need to be done

        No, a majority of voters want action on climate change, unfortunately a majority of elected representatives don’t, because most get fossil fuels donations to their campaigns.

        Moderate policies are popular policies.

        Not as popular as progressive policies…

        That’s kind of the whole point of American neoliberalism… alienate the left because “what are they going to do, vote R?”

        Then move slightly to the right in a perpetual misguided attempt to steal the conservatives from republicans.

        We’ve been trying that for 30 years now. The only result has been instead of slow progress, we take 10 steps back when republicans are in control, and moderates demand we worship them on the rare occasions we take five steps forward.

        It’s not working, and that should be pretty obvious to anyone who knows recent American history.

        Fighting extremism with moderation has never worked tho, that should be obvious to everyone.

        • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They want action without any downside. Not taxes. No economic hardship. Just like everyone wants $2 worth of governance for $.50. When polled on individual policies most people are very progressive. When it comes time to pay for all of it they get very picky, and vote for candidates that will do nothing. And that’s the popular outcome currently. It’s the mean of opinion. We aren’t as progressive as we would like to be.