Apple forced to ditch iPhone lightning charger::Apple confirms new iPhone 15 will have a common USB-C charging port after EU forces it into the change.

  • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    So funny seeing Apple fans eat up their PR. Ooh it was Apple’s plan all along? They did it because it’s more environmentally friendly? Yeah right and it only coincides the very same year EU is enforcing every manufacturer to go USB-C route. No one ever stopped to think if Apple is so environmentally friendly why were they fighting right to repair act.

    And don’t give me that “iPad had USB-C” speech. If lightning port could handle higher currents, iPad would have gone that route as well. USB has been standard for many years now but they have pushed so many different ports instead of going USB route. They don’t care about anything else other than milking a bit more money from their users.

    • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In my opinion, Apple’s choice to reduce the number and variety of ports on their devices in order to sell more dongles was where mobile device enshitification began in earnest. Now my phone just spys on me and vomits ads constantly and I can’t even plug in my fucking headphones.

      • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        They take ages to adopt great features that have existed on Android devices for years, and yet are THE leader of what corners to cut in the industry.

        • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          We like to call it innovation here, innovative ideas to fuck everyone and get a bit of bonus for the ceo

    • Cheez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      “iPad had USB-C”

      Any argument they make for iPads having USB-C is moot because they are still selling Lightning iPads.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      For me, nothing could ever possibly top Apple’s rejection of strain relievers on their cables. It’s absolutely the perfect blend of their overrated design sense with their unerring corporate instinct for planned obsolescence.

      • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also let us not forget Apple is the only laptop manufacturer whose laptops have failing SATA cables. I am yet to run into any laptop with drive cables failing.

        • wavebeam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sata cables? There aren’t sata cables in MacBooks and haven’t been for like a decade.

          • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Indeed. And yet I have never mentioned anything about what age laptops I was talking about. Then again, Apple was also only manufacturer with unibody laptop whose two parts unglued when you used your laptop for anything more intensive because they designed air flow in such a way so that hot air blows on “unibody” glued part. It’s just comedy all around.

      • sep@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        They saw the the writing on the wall, and turned colours as soon as they saw they were fighiting a loosing battle.

      • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Like any populist leader, they have just seen which way the crowd is moving, ran to the front and pretended that’s what they were going to do all along.

        I want to say that people like you falling for this is mind blowing, but it actually just seems to be a rather depressing part of human nature. I’ll never understand why people show such loyalty to a company that only cares about how much money they can extract from your pockets.

      • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ye no, i will only say they support it the moment their devices isnt made to not be repaired and have dark patterns all over them

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, they were forced to.

        If you actually look closer to their setup, it is extremely difficult and costs tons of money. Just to make their Genius bars seem reasonable.

  • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thank fuck, the lightning charger is hot dogshit, IMO. Th lack of compatibility of iphone is annoying, particularly around how 3rd party charging cords won’t work with their products sometimes.

    I had an iphone for over a decade, and finally switched to android. It suits me better. I spend a lot less time thinking ‘i should be able to do this’ and looking for a workaround

          • Graphine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’ll say this. For how much shit Steve Jobs gets, regardless of his personal life, he would never allow this shit to happen. That crazy bastard is responsible for getting rid of the floppy drive and pushing the industry towards USB 1.0 because he believed enough in it. That we would benefit.

            You can find old forum posts of the original iMac launch and see how surprised and somewhat upset people are at this revelation. Now look where we are.

            • Asudox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Pushed the industry towards USB before inevitably abandoning it for their proprietary lightning charger.

              • Graphine@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You do realize lightning was conceptualized AFTER his death?

                Not only that, but the industry standard at the time was Micro USB. So either a really good, reversible charger for the time, or a piece of shit cable that dies after 4 months. Take your pick.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Pro version does have it.

          Everything to push people into buying even more expensive shit, right?

      • Ocelot@lemmies.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The base 15 has the processor from the 14 pro, which does not have the USB 3.0 controller on it.

        Just like the base 14 had the processor from the 13 pro …and the base 13 had the processor from the 12 pro

        you get the idea.

    • sebinspace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Only good thing about Lightning was the connector itself, but USB-C is a much needed improvement. The speed thing though, that gets me, especially when non-flagship devices aren’t limited to 2.x speeds.

    • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Charger compatibility is a big thing. Back in the ancient days, sales men used to tell me to buy a Nokia phone because everyone had a Nokia charger at home. If you bought an Ericsson or Siemens, nobody could help you if you ran out of battery.

      Well that didn’t last forever, since Nokia eventually decided to switch to a slim connection, but before that the compatibility was really good.

    • Ocelot@lemmies.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      pretty much all smartphones past few years have been incremental upgrades. Sometimes theres some gimmick but it really feels like we’ve reached a peak

        • jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Idk why you’re being downvoted, its true. Folding screen technology has been pretty much the only major innovation in the phone space for a while now.

          • scarabic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Folding is high on the “neato” scale but isn’t considered a major milestone because it’s really sort of a gimmick and in smartphone terms, is a small niche feature. Most people don’t want a thicker phone that can become a too-small tablet by slowly forming a damage crease down its screen.

              • scarabic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                You can say that about literally every feature. But folding has been around 5 years and isn’t becoming integral to every device. Front facing cameras were within 5 years.

            • jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Disagree, the technology is improving and the shapes of the phone are becoming more usable.

              Anecdotally, i know a good amount of people who switched/want to switch off iphone to android specifically for folding phones. The form factor of the zflip/razr is a lot more usable for people who have small pockets or people who just think it’s plain cool.

              The “damage crease” isnt a huge deal, and most people upgrade after 3ish years anyway so as long as it can make it that far it won’t matter to them.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m excited about the Thread Network Protocol in the Pro version. I have no idea what will be implemented yet and Matter/Theead are rolling out way too slowly but it will be interesting to find out

  • HRDS_654@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    NOOOOOOO! This goes against their narrative that they chose to do it! How dare you!

    The only thing Apple chose themselves was placing an artificial limit on the port.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Apple has confirmed its new iPhone will not feature its proprietary lightning charging port, after the EU forced it into the change.

    The tech giant said that the iPhone 15, unveiled at its annual event on Wednesday, would use a USB-C cable as the “universally accepted standard”.

    The EU had told the tech giant to ditch its proprietary charging ports to make life easier for consumers, save them money, and help reduce e-waste by encouraging re-use of chargers.

    But some experts questioned whether consumers would be prepared to pay the high price tags given the devices are not hugely different to their predecessors.

    “Convincing users to fork out for these new devices will not be easy during a cost-of-living crisis,” said Paolo Pescatore, analyst and founder of PP Foresight.

    “Some will see the new features as incremental, [although] collectively they enhance the overall experience which is priceless among Apple’s core user base.”


    The original article contains 457 words, the summary contains 152 words. Saved 67%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wireless charging is a thing, but I’d say it’s less practical than just cleaning your port out every now and again.

  • bfg9k@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good. Fucking lightning with it’s fucking USB 2.0-ass interface.

    • 3laws@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And they still managed to cripple it with only 10 Gbps. Not even the “Pro” has USB4.

      • Ocelot@lemmies.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        what on earth are you doing on your phone…. hell… what is ANYONE doing on their phone that even comes close to using 10gbps?!