Germany is facing difficulties in taking in more migrants, President Frank-Walter Steinmeier said on Wednesday.

“Germany, like Italy, is at the limit of its capacity,” Steinmeier said in an interview with Italian Newspaper Corriere della Sera, pointing out that Germany had received a third of all EU asylum requests in the first half of 2023.

The president acknowledged that both Italy and Germany had “heavy loads to bear” and called for a “fair distribution” of migratory burdens within Europe.

  • Knusper@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Asylum seekers are not migrants. Migrants can be turned away with no moral fault. Asylum seekers, on the other hand, seek asylum from danger. Turning them away means leaving them exposed to that danger. If we do so, while we’re doing more than fine financially, then that is a violation of basic morals and human decency.

    • Bipta@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      While I agree with you, we also must recognize that there are limits to what can be done to help asylum seekers without breaking things and no longer being able to help anyone.

      • Beemo Dinosaurierfuß@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What a stupid argument to make.

        I don’t have to let another person (asylum seeking or not) into my personal private space to argue for them to have humane conditions.

        What do you even want to say?

      • Knusper@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m paying taxes. Why do I need to house them in my home in particular?

          • Knusper@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Alright? Increase taxes on those who have more money than they could ever spend and then help those who need a tiny fraction of that to fucking survive. I really don’t see why you think there’s no solutions here.

            • Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              Are all of your countries other problems solved? Increasing taxes on the rich somehow always turns into increasing taxes for everyone else. If you can pull it off, more power to you

              • Sodis@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                There is an easy solution for this: Tax property instead of income.

                • dezmd@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They do this already in addition to US Federal income tax. Florida, as one example, has no state income tax, but has tangible personal property tax, real property tax, and sales tax.

              • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Are all of your countries other problems solved?

                Is there a requirement that a person can only solve a problem if they personally have zero other problems in their life?

                somehow always turns into increasing taxes for everyone else.

                Citation needed. Good luck with that because the exact opposite result is the norm.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        4 the past 5 years in my home. Two moms and two babies on two separate occasions. This of course doesn’t include my donations and volunteering at centers.

        I am not sure you are aware of this but a private home is not a country.

        • Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          It must be nice to be able to financially afford a home, let alone one large enough to house others. Not to mention donations and free time to volunteer. Always nice to see people well off that are still grounded.