• itsmikeyd@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh believe me we will, but we have to wait for them to call an election (likely autumn 2024). They’re roundly despised and they know it. They’re just milking as much as they can before they’re flung out of Parliament.

      They’re a disgrace.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is there any indication that Labour would be any better on this particular issue?

        • itsmikeyd@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Idk. Im very pessimistic that this county is capable of any reasonable decision making tbh.

        • WeThePilgrims@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Very very very little indication they would be better, and I’m very left of center in politics.

          Starmer is very suss as far as I’m concerned, I’m not at all comfortable with his purges…if he gets in, we’ll see.

  • Rusticus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Apple has said they’ll pull out of UK if required. I won’t use any software that abides.

      • MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I might be cynical af but I believe China is a market they can’t ignore, but the UK, well…they can afford to send a message there. With some quick google-fu it looks like Apple sells more iPhones about every 8 days than it sells in the UK in a year. That’s comparing 2023 numbers for China to 2019 numbers in the UK for the record, I’m too lazy to look past the first few links really, and doubt that math would change enough to ruin the point.

        They also wouldn’t pull out of the UK, they would likely just revert to SMS there in the messages app rather than give the UK a back door into their encryption.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why I’m worried about Signal. Signal is designed as a central service, which means its easy to block/kill. If similar laws are brought to the country Signal operates from then it could be shutdown. Centralized applications are easy to monetize and easy to kill.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Perfect doesn’t have to be the enemy of good. Signal is Good, it could be better. There is a architectural weakness. There will be some other messenger that ticks all the boxes in the future, hopefully they will take what signal has done and continue to improve it.

        Signal is the easy for adoption because of the phone number as identity, but its weak because of the centralization. Its currently the best option. I don’t want to spend effort moving normal people to Briar or Session until its absolutely necessary, or those applications improve the onboarding experience.

        https://www.securemessagingapps.com/

        • Candid_Technology_66@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can’t send voice messages and videos or any type of file except for photos on Briar. I don’t have a problem with that myself, but it uses a lot of battery power.

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Briar is a long way from being generally useful to typical users, but i think its a gold standard example of something that is unkillable.

  • birdcat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh wow, the great UK really seems to love to show the world how advanced they are. Decrypt this then 🙄

    Password is only 8 characters.

    -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----

    jA0ECQMIg4RgH82c4/j+0sC6ASlYlE5UsjX2pJ7EL+c/XvjBdn2sfeaWyVZQenMW h+eMDp4vCSbhvVHpzVjwo0mJVKyLnINzjelRVQH0mPBuvs8wsGPitJ04xkixBrEI j/BDvunCqQHKh2rDSbqubuA64+74Zg2FqGsAgnTrxfK/78AFPfL1jM4GODxLt5IT duxVd06lE/zqJmhBL0uInovdKRsOjDoueHJBeXOSFpfYCoUcQsNkcOCZ7XiaaQus CUKVs1nCHWQZtjlRTxUzBRjkNFFVumXY+XI2S35ER8FveB6LdL0bqWCsJxSVUCMb +G3v5ckD/dvxVCrjxfeA4Xlvvk5ivZwsmkaWLz0KUl8tooxD3LBmbU3OTZ27sRxW SgTwGewFgxDTAlcbKaW46WI/Stbs3knYc2rQbMpu/DHqjz2GsYBENXOZEMYCnNtB tgRj6I5IqPieP2ZHUBXu8/ijL6Kl6UxKRtit7m0kttCfFWY8a1yhRfXGn57ZByxi Tj8jFHypznwgpSTE =cl6h -----END PGP MESSAGE-----

    • freddo@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oi M8 do you have a loicense for that Encryption? No? Well then, pay the foine or be branded a terrurist within the Five Eyes. /s

        • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is a random string of emojis btw, there’s nothing to see here.

          🙃💵🌿🎤🚪🌏🐎🥋🚫😆😍🕹ℹ😁🎈🏎😂☂😊📂☀🙃🌉🔄💧🐅😂🌊🍎☂👣😊😊👁🍵🎅👉🚫💧☺🍌🏎🎃🗒

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          The law laws will be written so that they don’t need to prove it. The suspicion will be enough, and innocent people will be punished for transmitting or storing unintelligible data.

        • Ricaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Actually I just made up my own written language that happens to consist of 64 case-sensitive characters in one string. This is how I communicate

    • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure, the title sounds like clickbait, but the point is: if a big enough player passes these laws, then the other countries may follow.

    • renormalizer@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they force messengers to implement backdoors into the protocol, I doubt they will limit it to UK users. Also, conversations with UK users won’t be private anymore even if the other party is from another country.

      Client-side scanning might not be enforced for other accounts but when the infrastructure is there other governments will want to use it, too.

      • Steeve@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That definitely won’t happen. Full E2EE apps like Signal, iMessage, and WhatsApp aren’t going to risk the worldwide backlash that would come with implementing backdoor access. The UK market isn’t that big and definitely not worth it, they’d pull out of the UK entirely first.

        • renormalizer@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I hope they will. My guess is that a nonprofit like Signal will pull out. They have nothing to gain and a reputation to lose. The others will probably comply by implementing some form of client-side scanning.

      • michel@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wonder if it will be analogous to the situation in China. Is an iMessage conversation safe if one party is based in China and their data is stored in data centers there?

  • Certainity45@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Just two years ago the politicians fearmongered that quantum computers will break every encryption without delay. This bill speaks quite different story.

    • TriStar@lemmyfly.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They will… when they finally get invented. For now though, law enforcement will have to do annoying things like “following the word of law” and convincing judges who clearly do not understand the national security implications of kids going to the wrong school to give them warrants.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Welp I don’t live in the UK so there is not much I can do. I would encourage any UK citizen to protest this immediately. If it still passes openly break the law to make the UK government into a laughing stock

  • OrkneyKomodo@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I get the importance, but the global implications are being slightly overstated. It may be the thin end of the wedge in terms that it may lead other governments to follow suit. But all that will happen in the short term is that many IM clients will withdraw from the UK. Apple will probably just disable iMessage in the UK.

  • paulcdb@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Or we could all just vote for people that aren’t corrupt… or at least, yet!

    If you don’t know who isn’t corrupt, vote for independents that understand technology. I know it’ll never happen so things will continue to go downhill but gees, what do governments have to do to get people to wake up? 🤬

    Hell, i’ll be happy if people just stopped believing ‘for the sack of the children’ crap and realise its all about controlling the population! 🙄🤦‍♂️

    • birdcat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yea voting is great, but when was the last time the UK had a prime minister that anyone voted for?

      • glue_snorter@lemmy.sdfeu.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        We’ve had four unelected PMs in seven years. (Although TBF two of them did then won elections.)

        The answer to your question is Boris Johnson, this time last year.