• federal reverse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The massive limiting factor for wind/solar/storage is still capex. Biomass is often labeled sustainable, thus often profits from subsidies, and has low capex. It has high opex and allows for high levels of centralization — which is exactly the kind of business power companies know.

    Fwiw, our local utility (mid-sized German town) is currently investing in “green” wood-burning and waste-burning facilities for district heating. It’s obvious that none if this is sustainable even as a business because there’s simply not enough wood waste in the 200-odd km radius they want to use. There’s also not enough household waste in the region for the waste facility. They do it anyway, partly because they’re incredibly scared of heat pump economics.

    • Womble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Waste burning at least seems to make sense, if its not burnt its only going to go into landfill and emit methane.

      • federal reverse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Except, the plant is sized to burn around 8x the amount of household waste produced in the city and regionally, there already are enough waste-burning plants for the current amount of household waste, making this a bet on a foreseeable race to the bottom.

      • Cort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s actually fine if the landfill has methane extraction systems. The methane can be used to generate electricity