• 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    "I’m hoping you’re going to put a line in your story about how cost-efficient I am,” he continued. “This is below minimum wage. No bathroom breaks, no meal breaks. This is a good investment, so please make sure that’s added to the story, okay?” [the mayor said]

    The mayor was enthusiastic about the cost-effectiveness of the robot. “I want you guys to be extremely creative in your writing style to say ‘Eric, job well done,’” he told reporters.

    This guy is special, isn’t he…

    The whole article basically lights it as a waste of money, since “[the police robot’s] effectiveness is unclear”, how there’s “no public evidence about actual crime reduction”, and how the “robot [needs] to be accompanied by a human officer at all times”, negating the need for the robot altogether.

  • gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    The NYPD will do literally anything and everything they can to make sure cops don’t actually work. 

    • papalonian@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh man. My old Walgreens had these and I begged the manager at my new store not to let them put them in. They still haven’t made their way over yet, maybe the company realized how absolutely idiotic they are.

      The only reason they wanted them is because when someone wasn’t standing directly in front of them they would play full screen ads for whatever was (supposed to be) inside.

  • ConsciousCode@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    So how long until people start advocating for the nonhuman, nonsentient robot over actual PoC? “Silicon lives matter”?