• TriflingToad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I see a lot of people in this thread justifying murder when that’s REALLY not what’s needed. That will just lead to the only people willing to be cops is maniacs with a gun (who are NOT in short supply) when we really need cops who can take a moment and think.

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      when we really need cops who can take a moment and think.

      Those people are actively filtered out by police.

    • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      We need to murder the concept of cops as we know them today. That’s the only murder we need. No individual’s death will fix a fucked up system, gotta kill the system itself.

        • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Well, I’d realistically suggest a slow strangle while we build up the alternative in tandem, maybe not “murder”, but I opted to use the wording of the poster I replied to.

          • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            What would the alternative be? I have never heard of a realistic solution that will be anywhere near the Overton Window and also backed up by data. Again, the last time Americans went without cops (CHAZ), it was a total disaster that “replaced” cops with people who did a far worse job when tasked with the same responsibilities.

            I’m not criticizing your use of the word “murder.”

            • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Re: murder, it was more a personal clarification hahah, murder implies a swift execution, versus a slow change.

              I do not claim to have the solution. That’s outside of my area of expertise. What I can say is that the implementation of policing we have now is failing, and I’d rather move towards something new than spin my wheels now.

              I can also say that, with how everything else in our society is organized, our current system of policing is probably the most practical. Any kind of change to it will likely be predicated on many other facets of society changing first or in tandem. I have no illusions that it’ll be an easy change.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      That sounds like my kind of accelerationism. Eventually cops will have to be dramatically changed.

    • 31337@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah… the fed-posting isn’t good. However, the current system of policing, and the entire rotten criminal justice system, is a system of oppression, is responsible immense amounts of pain and suffering, and can’t be saved by just hiring better people. Cruelty (and upholding hierarchy) is the point.

      • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I maintain that firing bad people and hiring good people is the only realistic way to increase the Good:Bad ratio high enough that many of these problems will evaporate.

    • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      My guess is its Kremlin propaganda, the same divisive stuff they pushed during the George Floyd riots

      • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        No man, there is plenty of organic distrust of the police here. The whole legal industry is fucked.

          • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s not a crack. This is a grand canyon scale chasm. The decline of the opinion of the police closely follows the release, and reporting, of crimes, and other unethical behaviors, of police. When BWC first started, it was a boon to the reputation of police. However, as the general public has been more able to record police themselves, which strips the police’s control of the who, when, how, and editing, of the recordings the public sees, the opposite effect started to happen. Now the police are working, furiously, to prevent people from recording them, from publicly releasing recordings of police for various reasons, making it harder, if not impossible, to attain BWC footage, and straight-up stopping the use of BWC. A lot more than that is going on. There has been a deluge of leaks of internal communications, amongst authorities, across the country, that are clearly stating that the cops should continue using unconstitutional practices, and that the government, at least locally, would have their backs. Then there is the leaking of footage from some of the most popular training regimes, and conferences, for police that are way out of line, showing they are clearly being trained to view the entire public as the enemy, and that it is fine to kill people, because the cop going home at the end of the shift, is the most important thing there is. This is just the tip of the iceberg of reasons why the police are losing favor.

            The police, the courts, the legislature, are who is responsible for the public outcry against the police. Not Russia, not China, not any foreign power.

        • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, I agree a lot of them are kind of dumb, many of them are power tripping assholes. Doesn’t mean people should be ADVOCATING FOR THEIR FUCKING MURDER.

          They do nothing but ruin people’s lives

          Complete horseshit. If you actually think that maybe you’re the one who’s real dumb.

      • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I wish. There was that one cop was put away for defending a woman from SA a year after snitching on his fellow officers. His laywer said never heard of jail time for 1st time misdominer. They literally put him in a cell with a known cop killer. Who said naa this is one of the good ones.

            • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Can you think in anything more nuanced than anecdotes and sweeping generalizations? Got anything better than a strawman to respond with?

              • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Why would I think of something better than a strawman when replying to a strawman?

                As I said in another post: Cops protect the bourgeois, white-supremacist, colonialist, patriarchal state by enacting violence on the ruled class. That’s not a judgement: it’s their purpose in the system.

                Individuals with bully-like personalities self-select into that job, while decent people are actively shunned. Because group cohesion is more important than “doing the right thing”.

                Why do you defend cops so much?

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh no, I’m American and just been walked through the system too many times to believe in it. They’re terrorists and calling themselves your protectors.

  • qooqie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    58
    ·
    2 months ago

    A bit brutal. I know it’s just a meme, but I don’t think them dying is the answer. We can be better, we can do better

      • qooqie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t really mind if you disagree because sadly cops will always be a part of modern society. So making them better is important to future generations

          • qooqie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            2 months ago

            Okay, what about calling it current society? I don’t see current society being able to change this for a long long time

            • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              24
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              2 months ago

              The main function of cops is to protect the bourgeois, white-supremacist, patriarchal, colonialist state. I would like to get rid of the latter, so the former needs to go.

              • prowe45@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                So if and when we make that happen, and we have a society free of that stuff, do we think everything will always be perfect and free of conflict and no one will break the (hopefully much improved) laws? That seems unlikely, so we’ll need some kind of way of keeping the order, right? Will it not be the responsibility of a specific job? Will there be people with that job but we won’t call them any of the names we currently have for that general job category?

                • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  You won’t be able to recognise the so-called “justice system” or “order” in that hypothetical society, so no: that job won’t exist anymore.

                  Yes, harm can still be done and this future society should and will find ways to prevent and/or heal that harm. Neither of these things are the police’s job, so why should we call that hypothetical job like the old system of violence?

                  Even if you think that those things are done by the police: do you still call a shoe designer/manufacturer a cobbler?

              • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                The idea that people can live without some form of policing is ricidulous once you’ve seen some of the darker parts of humanity. Visit Haiti, Somalia, slums just about anywhere on the planet.

                You sound like some 22 year old with a couple years of higher education, and now you think you have all the answers.

                • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  You sound like a child who still believes what they told you in Paw Patrol.

                  So… do you know any of the history of Somalia and Haiti? How they got into that situation?

                • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  The idea that people can live

                  People don’t live. They always die. Living and dying are the same process.

        • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          One of my first memories is my father’s domestic violence against my mother. She called the police. They laughed at her.

          The one time they arrested him, no matter the physical evidence, no matter the testimony from any number of witnesses (e.g. neighbours), was when he kicked a police officer.

          Fuck the police.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Cops don’t seem to understand much except when a thing is alive or dead. This is the only kind of message that will get through to all of them.

      • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        “I dislike cops because they shoot people to solve a crisis. Anyway, let’s shoot people about this crisis.” - a lot of people, apparently

    • tee9000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Thank you.

      Imagine being so diluted that you think all cops should die.