Former President Donald Trump’s reelection threatens to worsen global climate change by altering the trajectory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, eroding federal climate research and forecasting, and abdicating America’s leadership role in global climate negotiations.

Why it matters: His return to the White House comes at a time when climate scientists have warned that the Paris Agreement’s warming targets are slipping dangerously out of reach, raising the odds of potentially catastrophic consequences.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I don’t know why the focus is on US emissions and not production.

    We produced more fossil fuels under Biden than trump, the difference is we use fossil fuels to ship the rest of the fossil fuels half way around the planet for them to burn over there.

    Shit will get worse, but it has been getting worse longer than most of us have been alive.

    If the best we can ever do is slow down the increase of damage rate, we’re just mopping the deck of the Titanic while it goes down.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Importing fossil fuels is more of an accelerant to climate change than domestic production. Approximately 40% of global cargo ships are carrying fossil fuels.

      Increased production does not imply increased consumption. Our dependence on fossil fuel has decreased, and renewable energy consumption has increased, in the last four years.

      https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=62444

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      55 minutes ago

      I don’t know why the focus is on US emissions and not production.

      We produced more fossil fuels under Biden than trump

      That’s why. The sections of the billionaire-owned media that don’t deny anthropogenic climate change or pretend that it’s a good thing all have a vested interest in pretending that Dem leadership can do no wrong.

      If the best we can ever do is slow down the increase of damage rate, we’re just mopping the deck of the Titanic while it goes down

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        36 minutes ago

        That’s like people really want to still brag about “Biden’s signature climate legislation” despite fossil fuel companies publicly asking for trump to keep it, because it’s making them so much money.

        Rather than just doing what Dem voters want and getting the votes, Dem politicians keep doing what Dem voters hate for the donation money, then try to use it to convince all the people they pissed off to still vote for them.

        If the goal is electing Dems the DNC is completely incapable.

        If their goal is making sure billionaires keep accumulating wealth tho, they’re doing a great job ensuring regardless of who wins an election the wealthy always make more money.

  • AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’m sorry but what was the current administration doing about the climate?

    Paris accords are trash, but even if they were good goals the US hasn’t made any serious effort to meet them

    Until we dramatically change business as usually, no one president is really at fault

    • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 minutes ago

      The Paris Accords were bullshit propaganda with no teeth for enforcement. They talked about mitigating climate change while the 2 US proxy wars dumped millions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere.

      Edit sp