• jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    no it doesn’t harris raised almost a billion in 3 days. that billion was not committed to biden. not even 200 million of it was before he dropped out. trump won on 400 million.

    • Steve
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      I’m not sure how any that matters to any campaign finance rules that might prevent Biden from giving his war chest to another candate?

      • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        You dont realize how the majority of money was raised after he dropped out and that trump managed to win with half of the money is relevant to the discussion of ‘only harris could access biden’s campaign funds.’ nonsense reasoning the dnc and media gave for why we absolutely must go with harris as the candidate?

        • Steve
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          Oh! Now I get it. You’re talking about something I wasn’t. It’s true none of that has anything to do with the rules specifically, like I thought. But instead, you want to talk about some broader point we weren’t thinking or talking about. Okay. Yes your right. It matters to the larger situation, beyond the scope of our immediate discussion. Thank you for explaining.

          • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            Np. As for the campaign finance laws im also fairly certain those excuses were a load of bunk too. I dont believe anything prevented biden campaign from returning them to the donors and letting them reallocate.