Microsoft Looking to Use Nuclear Reactors to Power Its Data Centers::undefined

  • YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Clippy: it looks like you are trying to prevent a nuclear meltdown….

    Oh yes, what could go wrong. Windows can’t even run an advertising board without blue screening…

    “The core is about to melt down! Hit the shutdown button!!” “I can’t, it’s installing updates!!!”

      • Joe@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It mostly runs. An Azure-optimized HyperV build is the primary hypervisor I think, but I’d wager that most customer VMs on Azure are running Linux. However, if you want to run Windows in the cloud, it’s a decent option.

        My experience with Azure has been less than stellar. They have good API documentation, but tooling & core compute is a bit janky. The web UI is also a throwback to a past era, but you can’t really avoid it when debugging issues which you have to do often during development. Then the developers want to forget all about it … which is a problem when something inevitably breaks.

        • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If something like that actually were to happen, that would be a huge design flaw. Not that I’d be surprised, though.

    • Smokeydope@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Somewhere in some timeline relatively close to ours this actually happens, the idea of 3 mile island/Chernobyl 2.0 event happening to microsofts personal reactor because a forced windows update screws over emergency override software is peak absurdist dystopia that I get chuckles from