• IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Or maybe they should just leave the Democratic party and start a new progressive party? We have less than 4 years, but that’s also the most time we’ll ever have.

      • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Oh, I’m all for ranked choice voting, but in order for it to have any meaning we also need a plurality of parties. They also need time to build and I’m sure these two would start a good one if allowed.

        Although the likelihood of political parties having any weight at all past January is anyone’s guess…

        • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Without rank choice voting any progressive party would act as a spoiler for the Democratic Party. Debilitating ourselves in this way isn’t particularly useful for leveraging power to create better outcomes for the environment and minorities.

          • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 minutes ago

            A few weeks ago, I’d have agreed with you, but now? The Democratic party that just lost 10 million votes… We’ll spoil that party? The one that just lost a fair election to a convicted felon? You want to protect them from being spoiled?

            We have 4 years, which is, again, the most time we’ll ever get to try something like this because that’s how 4 year election cycles work. What is it exactly that they’re doing successfully you don’t want to spoil?