• JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    14 days ago

    We can always go back to the old ways of having a download from the company website and downloading directly from them. What? Nobody wants to pay for bandwidth? Nobody wants to have to pay for secure management of credentials and billing? :O

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Those days didn’t even exist (or if they did, they were very short). I feel like Steam came out just before the broadband boom (when they released HL2, it was still on five CDs). And by the time other devs started switching, most of them just went to Steam.

      However, re: the broadband thing, they could distribute with bittorrent, kind of like how linux distros do it.

      • JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        Uh, all games had patches and mappacks downloaded directly from the game’s distributor. It was extremely slow, hence the invention of CDNs like filehippo, hwfiles, 2cows etc and some gaming companies (at the time you could rent your own server and host the games. Incredible, huh? You could also have LAN parties and play with your clan against other clans all using LAN, no internet required) were also doing mirroring of those files (in Italy it was gamearena and ngi, for example). Steam wasn’t even a thing.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          Lol patches… Unless you were having LAN parties, or attempting to play a game of AOE2 over dialup (hoping your mom doesn’t try to use the phone), you just ran whatever version of the game came on the disc. By “you”, I guess I meant me.

    • insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      For bandwidth, it’d absolutely make sense if a game that’s 10GiB+ because uncompressed audio and pre-rendered cutscenes (and likely huge day-1 updates) had to pay more of a cut to its platform than a 200MiB (or less) game. Particularly if the smaller game doesn’t even have multi-player.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      14 days ago

      Nobody wants to pay for bandwidth? Nobody wants to have to pay for secure management of credentials and billing? :O

      They absolutely would if it didn’t mean getting deprioritized on Steam. Those things aren’t that difficult or expensive these days. I could have secure management of credentials and billing up in a weekend if I needed it (correctly), and I’m a single developer.

      Steam is better than Microsoft, Apple, Google and Tencent. Using monopoly power to maintain the 30% standard is still a problem.