• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    13 days ago

    What if your kid was in his 50s, and has spent decades showing they’re not going to change and you know the reason they’re such a shit person is you helped them escape consequences their whole lives.

    To the point where they literally write an autobiography admitting to a litany of crimes?

    Would you continue to shield him of consequences to the point you pardon him for “any and all crimes” over more than a decade?

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        And I agree with that, because it’s a child you are teaching.

        I was asking if you hadn’t ever let you kid face consequences till his 50s, he publicly confessed for crimes you were aware of and didn’t turn him in.

        Because at 50 years old… You’re not teaching them a lesson.

        So would you continue knowing your son is gonna just keep smoking crack and breaking laws, or would you treat them like any other person and throw them headfirst into the justice system like the crime bill you wrote in 1992 did to tens of millions of actual children for 32 years?

        • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          OP’s question was a out whether I would encouragey child to do whatever they want, lneing I could remove any criminal consequences. I would not so encourage them. Grind your axe elsewhere.