• RupeThereItIs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Ok, but, why is microwaved water any different the water warmed in a kettle?

    This seems like a pointless thing to get worked up over.

    • CelloMike@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      5 days ago

      Went to see Randall doing his book promo and being interviewed by Matt Parker (in the UK) recently and this was his exact position on it

      The audience were not on his side 😆

    • MicrowavedTea@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      In my experience you won’t actually boil water in the microwave because it takes an eternity so you end up with tea in “warm” water instead. Or apparently some people also put the tea bag in the microwave ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Brother it takes 3 minutes to boil water in the microwave. I have done this without fail.

        It cools down much faster though. Not sure how that works.

            • TechieDamien@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              It may appear that way if it was unevenly heated, causing pockets of boiling water surrounded by comparatively cool water. This would make it look like it’s boiling, but then, when mixed, it is then much cooler than if heated by a kettle that relies on convection to mix the water.

            • 0xD@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 days ago

              You can prove it by boiling the water in different ways, putting a thermometer inside and then filming/timing it :D

          • Max@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            It definitely depends on the microwave. In my office, one boils a mug in 2:20, while the other requires over 3 min

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Water warmed in a kettle has much more even temperature in all points, which affects the brewing process. Generally, the more even the temperature is, the more consistent and rich is your brew.

      I would consider microwave boiling as a makeshift method to produce a mediocre result when you need it anyway, not as a daily driver.

      • redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m asking this from a place of genuine ignorance: how does the evenness of the heat distribution matter when microwaving a pure liquid? I’m familiar with the microwave’s uneven heating qualities. I’m sure we’ve all bit into food that is scalding hot on the surface and still lukewarm at best in its interior. However, I’ve always presumed that is a product of microwaving a heterogenous, predominantly solid substance.

        So, sure, the microwave applies heat unevenly to the water. But wouldn’t the tiny little bits of water which get “over” heated simply diffuse their excess thermal energy into the rest of the homogenous volume in very short order? Furthermore,wouldn’t an uneven heat distribution in a mug of water simply lead to convection currents flowing from hot to cold, therefore promoting a relatively even distribution?

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          The overheated particles will rapidly move upwards, which will lead to relatively even distribution in a layer, but uneven between heights.

          In fact, in a large microwaved mug the difference between top and bottom can be as much as 6°C/11°F.

          Using a kettle mitigates it for the most part, as it is the bottom that gets continuously heated, and the top is then naturally heated by the vertical currents of hot water, leading to a more even distribution.

            • Allero@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Ideally 2 to 3 rounds, yes.

              But at that point, isn’t it easier to just buy a kettle? It doesn’t require such manipulations, costs next to nothing and allows you to rapidly boil up to 1,5-2L (0,4-0,5 gal) of water for all your needs.

              There’s a good reason most of the (Western, at least, dk about other places) world uses them and considers them a basic piece of kitchenware.

              • filcuk@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                In the US, kettles are supposedly much slower than a microwave or even a hob due to their grid.

                • Allero@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  Fair enough; but even then, American kettles can boil water at a very reasonable time (3 minutes for 1,5L?)

                  Still, I can understand how that extra minute alters the choice for many.

      • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        How does a kettle warm the water more evenly but a microwave doesn’t? When a kettle has it’s heating element only at the bottom but a microwave blasts the entire mass of water with energy because it sits on a rotating plate.

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Exactly because of that.

          Hot water moves upwards, and if you heat it from the bottom, you get a more even result than if you blast it from all sides.

        • manicdave@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Cold water falls to the bottom of a kettle and boils on the bottom. Microwaves can miss the bottom, possibly?

    • Famko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      5 days ago

      Could be a problem if you microwave it together with the tea bag.

      Also I find microwaves to not heat up the water properly, leaving some cold spots.

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        The microwaves will heat your water more evenly than a kettle.

        Liquids have this amazing property, that if you heat them , they auto-stir just by themselves.

        (But personally, I’m uneasy about microwaving a tea bag with paper on one end, or worse, a staple. There’s probably no problem at all, but it doesn’t feel that way.)

      • nandeEbisu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 days ago

        So give it a quick stir? Also if it’s at a boil, the bubbles are going to mix the fluid well.