• jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    https://www.law.gmu.edu/pubs/papers/05_26

    "In the single product case, courts have consistently applied the ‘not easy to establish’ two part test for predatory pricing set out by the Supreme Court in its Brooke Group decision.  As a result, the courts have generally ruled that above-cost volume discounts, including those that use market share discounts and near exclusive thresholds, are lawful and do not violate the antitrust laws. "

    https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/509/209/

    “Evidence of below-cost pricing is not alone sufficient to permit an inference of probable recoupment and injury to competition. The determination requires an estimate of the alleged predation’s cost and a close analysis of both the scheme alleged and the relevant market’s structure and conditions. Although not easy to establish, these prerequisites are essential components of real market injury.”