• Chaos0f7ife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Probably about two or three years before I was born. I was a 90s baby and lived through one of the best decades in human history in terms of childhood entertainment. Nick Toons, Razor scooters, sock’em Boppers, and Pokemon just to name a few. Also cartoons themselves were the best that television had to offer. Hey Arnold, Rugrats, and Dragon Ball Z, just to name a few. If you were a kid in the 90s, you were in your PJs, eating cereal and watching Saturday Morning Cartoons, while your Holographic Charizard sat in your sock drawer so nobody was knew where it was. And your Nintendo 64 with the Legend of Zelda Ocarina of Time was still warm because you threw a tantrum when you couldn’t beat the Water Temple. After Cartoons, you got your clothes on and went outside to play baseball with the boys while ignoring the girls because they have cooties and you don’t want to contract cooties, while secretly having a crush on one of them.

    At the end of the day, your parents called you in for dinner because it was getting dark out and, with mud and grass stains littering your shirt, you laugh with all your friends, knowing that, after a dinner of spaghetti and meatballs, you where going back to your room to play on your N64 again untill 2 in the morning when your parents are finally fed up with the noise and tell you to go to bed.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Since I don’t have a lot of experience with many places outside my hometown, probably my hometown around 1985AD so I could grow up enjoying the 90s.

    As much as I love the technology of today, I absolutely love 90s cartoons, music, and plenty of old 90s games. Plus the Internet of the time on places like Geocities, from what I’ve seen from archived sites, absolutely had amazing charm to them.

    The one thing I wouldn’t like about the deal is the part about being born in the 80s since I’m not a fan of that decade. That, and I am completely unaware of the history of mechanical heart valves and when they started becoming a thing used in open heart surgery (if the medical technology of the time would even be able to pick up the little growth like thing that was attached to my valve when I was born).

  • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 days ago

    I choose to use my powers for evil. I will pop into existence in 2000 BC, 50 yards from the future Apollo 11 landing site. Neil Armstrong is going to make one small step for a man. Then he is going to shit in his space diaper when he finds a 4000 year old dessicated infant corpse just sitting there, completely inexplicably, exposed on the lunar surface.

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Exactly what I came here to say. Well, I would specify sex rather than gender. I wouldn’t want to be born female at any point in history.

      • cabbage@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I guess at least there are those specific moments in history when, if you were to be born in a specific country, being a woman at least significantly increases your life expectancy.

        If I knew what shit was about to go down and I had to be born in, say, Soviet Russia in 1925, I would probably have opted to be a woman. Not because it seems so darn great, but because chances of at least making it to age 30 would significantly improve.

        Then again, not a point in history I would particularly favour.

      • Case@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Hoo, I’d say loaded statement, but… well, you’re factually correct. Just polarizing.

        That being said, I appreciate my mom for a lot of things, but the major one is my views on feminism.

        I’m not some pro-female only person. First wave feminism, equality.

        My wife is a strong woman who doesn’t need me, fuck, she’s the breadwinner and has been for most of the relationship.

        She kicks ass, takes names, and somehow still has the energy to pick up the house a bit. I was weaker in that last part in the beginning, but I’ve made strides. Definitely a learned experience, but a very valid one.

        I’ve dated the ultra girly-girl type. Its isn’t for me. I want a partner who is fine standing on their own, and chooses companionship.

        Shit, she has worked in hospitals and had grown men attack her (health care worker violence is shockingly common, and I’ve experienced it as a man who worked at a hospital in a non-clinical capacity) She takes no shit. She’s also smart as a whip.

        A dumb bimbo is easier to date, and I would guess be married to, but ultimately unfulfilling. Have a thought. Defend your thought. Please. If a man can’t deal with that, they aren’t much of a man.

        • Coriza@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          That is a weird comment. Maybe I am just dumb but I read it all and I have no idea what you are trying to say apart some type of women is ok and other not so much?

          Also what is polarizing in what Drusas said?

          • Case@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Well, factually, throughout history, women have had a terrible deal.

            Living in red states my whole life, women having opinions, much less rights, is polarizing.

            I don’t agree, but man… women voting is STILL an issue in some rural areas. Thus, polarizing. Not so much with the common consensus, but with some.

            • Coriza@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              I can see women voting as being polarizing but just stating the facts of women’s condition throughout history not so much. But alas I guess in post-truth world that we leave I can see that a substantial share of population can decide to ignore such common information. So I guess it can be polarizing. That is just sad.

  • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I really liked being a kid and teenager through the 80s and 90s, I don’t think I’d change that. But I would certainly accept the opportunity to do it again!

    Maybe this time in Japan, instead of the US. Though the US would be fine too.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Ten years earlier, i.e. mid-1980s. I would have been a young adult when the Internet was starting to be awesome, instead I was a preteen or early teen.

    As for location, the US would be nice tbh.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      You’d probably want 20 years earlier, i.e. mid-1970s. Mid-1990s were when the Internet was starting to be awesome. Broadband was just coming out, but the first web browser was already 5 years old in 1995.

        • zout@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 days ago

          I was born in 1975, and my youth was pretty awesome. I was also born in the Netherlands, so booze (and drugs, but I never did that) were available at a young age. Also, affordable concerts and festivals and great music scenes.

  • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    Sometime in the future, assuming the human race even lasts long enough.

    Basically when a world like Star Trek TNG exists.

    All my stupid health problems could be fixed.

    To be able to travel space would be great, to lay on the moon and watch the Earth. Go admire Jupiter (from a distance).

    Work, not because I have to, but because I enjoy the challenge and want to better myself and humanity.

    I know for the show they couldn’t really go all out, but I think being a holodeck author would be fun as a side hobby. Could be in a fun working out with whomever inspired you. Hands on learning, anything. Visit places you can’t (like surface of Venus). But also think of like what a video game would be like because you wouldn’t need a controller or VR headset you’re just there. So you could be a Space Marine. Or be Spider-Man! We’ve done reading books, we’ve done watching books, we’ve even done audiobooks… But there you could participate. Or maybe just be there and watch it unfold.

  • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    Height of the incan empire would be nice tbh. Fucking beautiful place to live and relatively comfortable conditions

      • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The Incans did very little human sacrifice and in the places where sacrifice was more common, like the aztec empire, it was mostly prisoners of war. Essentially they just moved the deaths of war from the battlefield to the city, they weren’t any more violent than the people of the old world. Even still we probably overestimate the scale of human sacrifice because so many of our records come from the spanish who aren’t exactly a trustworthy source on the matter.

        Personally I consider modern places like the US to be significantly more violent than any of the indegenous cultures of the Americas. We just don’t see it like they did.

  • kyub@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    1-2 decades earlier maybe (meaning: 60s or 70s). Location… I don’t know. Maybe Norway, I’ve never heard anything bad about Norway. Might just be random selection bias though.

    • cabbage@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Norway only discovered oil worth extracting December 23 1969. So you would not have grown up in a particularly rich country, but you would see the country gain incredible wealth as you grew older.

      If you were born in the early 60s and bought a house in the early 80s, you’d be pretty fucked when the global economy crashed. But I guess that goes for everywhere. The 70s would probably be a better bet in that sense.

      You’d probably not live in a city, but in some village in the middle of nowhere. So the wealth of the country would mostly be noticable through the social security web built around you, and the fact that your random village suddenly got a tunnel to it. If you’re a farmer you’d receive subsidies so it would be somewhat possible to keep going, even as your peers in continental Europe would run out of business one by one.

      You’d probably secretly wish you would also go out of business so you could retire to something less taxing.

      You would spend your childhood amazed by America, and jealous of the youth revolution going on there. You’d watch American movies and grow up idolizing American and British war heroes. You would think your stupid valley was the most boring place on earth.

      In your old age, you would thank your lucky star you’re not in America. Maybe you’d get a house in Spain for the cold winters. Your family would think less of you for it, but they wouldn’t be vocal about it.

  • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    Eh, maybe just a decade earlier so that I would have had a chance to see Pantera play live. Otherwise meh

    • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The advent of computer technology is kind of hard to pass up but there were other things in history that could have been just as interesting on a different level. It might have been cool to be an explorer when the americas were discovered. Ok life would have been pretty miserable but the vast unknown would have been cool. Still would be hard to give up modern medicine.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    2000s USA, in an alternate timeline where world leaders actually fought against the impending climate crisis, Dubya was never elected, and I’m born to a non-toxic middle class (actual rich people are toxic btw) family, and this alternate world already got rid of racism for at least 100 years already and on the way to elminate the wealth gap.

    (But, nah, such a world doesn’t exist. Fucking world line convergence fucking me over. I need to like get 10 attractor fields to another set of world lines to get out of this mess.)

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    Chicago such that I turned 17 in 1973 when the draft was formally stopped… So 1956 then. Then ideally get an associates for next to nothing and transfer to urbana in the now the later half of the 70’s which is a perfect time to get a computer science degree.

  • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Im always stuck on the point that we never consented to existance, can I simply decline to be born in this hypothetical because I think thats my pick.