• testfactor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I agree with you, but this is an “anti work” community, and there’s a substantial part of the movement that is techno-utopian and is actively arguing for the dissolution of work in general.

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I’m fairly tech-utopian myself, but it’s is more of an aspirational goal that won’t help anybody for the foreseeable future. Automation will become capable of performing all human labor, but having it actually do that will take a lot longer because it will require reshaping our whole society. It will essentially mean the end of money, and therefore the end of some people being hugely wealthy compared to everybody else, which those people won’t want to let go of.

    • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I understand, but until the technology necessary for a transcendentalist, post-scarcity, post-work society is developed (assuming said technology is even possible), work will remain absolutely necessary.

      • randomdeadguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Gosh, I hate to disagree with you, but it seems like multi-generation inheritance might affect the necessity of work for some. Currently.