His grand vision remains to leave Mastodon users in control of the social network, making their own decisions about what content is allowed or what appears in their timelines.

I don’t use Mastadon cause I don’t care for micro-blogging, but nevertheless, I like this.

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Nothing, which is okay. People make the mistake of thinking users have any even passing interested in a good platform with social media, not just the social connections on it.

      That is why Bluesky can be so successful: It’s an absolutely smooth and effortless drop-in replacement for Twitter, and has no gathered enough momentum for it to be easy to find existing people you want to follow on it, further drawing more people who you might want to follow in. So the motivation to use it is there, and the switch itself is essentially unnoticable.

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I mean it kinda already is a Twitter, just 5 years in the past.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Bluesky is still running on VC cash. We haven’t seen how they plan on monetizing it yet, but if anything that is where their major fuckup will happen.

      • havocpants@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 minutes ago

        We haven’t seen how they plan on monetizing it yet

        Enshittification once they have enough users, that’s usually how these things go. I swear we don’t learn.

      • vga@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        All of these applications (yes, also Lemmy and Mastodon) are feed for the AI machine. That’s where the money is.

        And ads probably.

    • Noxy@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Absolutely nothing. I fully expect it to follow a similar trajectory.

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        You still have to go through the central hub. You can’t spin up your own, wholly independent Bluesky. You can only make your own node.

        • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          This is not true.

          The App view, relay, PDS, and mobile app, code is all open source. Anyone can spin up their own version if they want.

          If you want a complete copy of bluesky (reflecting the bluesky post firehose) it’s prohibitively expensive, but you can spin up your own version if you want.

          The only thing that’s missing is bluesky federating anything other than PDSes by default, but you can 100% go in the other direction.

          A good overview is here: What bluesky is and what bluesky is not

          • XNX@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            I wonder if we’ll see p2p versions of the firehose so people can seed posts from accounts they trust/like as a way to make firehoses affordable for the public to run

            Especially considering the lead dev was the creator of beaker browser https://beakerbrowser.com/

        • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          It’s not something where any one person can really host their own instance long term — though people still do (for now). But AtProto is designed so a reasonably-sized company (or maybe a well-funded foundation) can host their own instance and either make a clone or do something novel.

          As I understand it, the core difference is just the scale of what you’d have to host. ActivityPub only downloads what users on an instance interact with so you could easily run your own one-person instance on a home computer. A BlueSky instance downloads everything so you’d essentially need the scale of BlueSky (which is already in the terabytes)

          The upside to AtProto for users is that your username and content are all portable and you can switch providers (or even use multiple) and not lose anything. ActivityPub’s downside is that it can leave you at the mercy of your admin. Not a big deal on the main instances but there’s been some drama moments where some admin freaked out and those users essentially lost their account.

          AtProto/BlueSky was originally envisioned (pre-Musk) as Twitter being semi-decentralized so it’d essentially be the hub of a wider ecosystem. But, obviously, the world’s worst truck designer had other plans.

        • Vincente@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          Yes, it’s not a full web3 app, but I like that these apps are heading in the right direction.

          However it’s better than Twitter/Instagram. I can control my feed!

          • takeda@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Twitter also looked great until it didn’t, it even comes from the same guy.

            While at this moment BlueSky looks good, we will end up the same way sooner or later. Muskov et. al. figured out how to monetize social media. Now Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and others are tools to manufacture opinion. And certain opinions are worth a lot to certain people.

            • reka@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              it even comes from the same guy

              The seed money came from Twitter, allocated by Jack Dorsey and he had a position on the board that he didn’t really make use of. He literally left because he is against centralised moderation and didn’t have enough influence to prevent bsky implementing it.

            • reka@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Feeds offer algorithm transparency and you can use alternative frontends. ATProto can’t suddenly be turned to private and disable third party access, it is intrinsically public.

      • takeda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        16 hours ago

        That’s a red herring, they still have full control of the network.