The Duff CEO with a Windows-Logo on his forehead: “Gamers use Windows because of its’ user experience not our de facto monopoly.”

Next Image: Duff CEO with Windows-Logo in front of a “Out of Business” sign. Subtitle: “30 minutes after SteamOS is released”

Edit: Yo, I’m not saying this is gonna happen. I just want to say that Windew’s UX sucks ass.

  • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    My problem is that being in denial about the state of gaming on Linux (better than before, still garbage) does nothing to improve the state of gaming on Linux.

    Do you think that was profitable for Steam (from people voting with their wallet), or do you think Steam did it for charity out of the kindness of their hearts?

    You seem to think that Valve developed Proton to capture the Linux marketshare. That’s unbelievably naive.

    • msage@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      33 minutes ago

      How is gaming support on Linux “still garbage”?

      90% of games work out of the box. No tweaks, just press play.

      You have options for launchers, Steam, Heroic, Lutris…

      I’ve dropped Windows about 8 years ago, and I missed on a couple of games, mostly due to the anticheat bullshit.

      I even mod my games on Linux without issues.

      There were more issues with gaming on Windows than issues I had on Linux.

      • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 minutes ago

        It could be 99% of games and it wouldn’t matter if the remaining 1% are what people actually wanna play. Support for games outside of Steam is beyond the capabilities of most PC users. Most people don’t actually enjoy playing Troubleshooting Simulator.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You seem to think that Valve developed Proton to capture the Linux marketshare. That’s unbelievably naive.

      Okay, so why did they develop it?

      • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Because Microsoft has the power to end Steam almost overnight so Valve is desperately trying to move people away from Windows. Linux just happened to be a useful tool but Proton aims to capture the Linux userbase about as much as ChromeOS does.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Microsoft has the power to end Steam almost overnight

          You want to explain that one? Yes, Steam was exclusively on Windows, but how exactly would Microsoft “end them almost overnight” without immediately being slapped with significant lawsuits? Do you honestly believe Microsoft would put something in their code that specifically excludes Steam?

          You call me nieve and then claim the reason was wild conspiracy theories…

          • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            44 minutes ago

            Lawsuits won’t do anything to stop Microsoft in the short term, look at what happened to Netscape. Valve understands that “voting with your wallet” doesn’t work because the majority of people will buy whatever the current monopoly holder tells them to buy.

            wild conspiracy theories…

            Do you live under a rock? Valve has been very clear about their intentions since the days of the Steam machines.

            https://www.zdnet.com/article/valve-windows-8-is-a-catastrophe-for-pcs/

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              25 minutes ago

              “I think we’ll lose some of the top-tier PC/OEMs, who will exit the market. I think margins will be destroyed for a bunch of people. If that’s true, then it will be good to have alternatives to hedge against that eventuality.”

              It was done for profit. The exact thing I’ve been saying.

              • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 minutes ago

                That quote doesn’t mean what you think it means. And you haven’t been saying it was done for profit, you’ve been saying it was done because “people voted with their wallet”.