• Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The feature isn’t worth $15,000. They charge you that much to send a small, very specific sequence of bits to your car. That’s what you’re paying for because the feature’s already built in.

    • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel a bit conflicted on this. On the one hand, charging for heated seats that are already there and which is a purely hardware feature is bullshit.

      Other things like Full Self Driving aren’t as black and white. Sure, the sensors are there but those are relatively cheap. A massive part of FSD is the software, and developing this kind of software is extremely expensive.

      Should everyone get a copy of Windows and Office for free because it’s ‘just some bits’ and the hardware is already there?

        • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Should programmers work for free? Will someone provide me with a free car to develop this on? Will someone provide me with a free test track?

  • Noah@lemmy.federated.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s ridiculous how nowadays a lot of hardware car features are locked behind a simple software switch. Feels like both a massive waste of resources for people that don’t buy the upgrades, and like having to pay for a feature that is already physically present in your car. Software-only upgrades like full self driving are understandable, hardware upgrades locked behind a software gate aren’t.