• Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    You voluntarily keep coming back to reply to this, purely because you can’t handle the thought of admitting to a mistake or a silly thing you may have said.

    I’m just bored, and I genuinely think this is a lesson worth teaching you.

    You simply can’t address the actual argument anymore. You had a lot to say earlier. Can’t stand behind your own words or “arguments” now?

    So… here’s the coup de grâce;

    Which one of the following English sentences would you use to express admiration and adoration of a person?

    “[female celebrity] is my heroine!”

    OR

    “[female celebrity] is my hero!”

    See if you use the first one, as your rhetoric implies you want to, and think everyone should participate in this needless gendering, then you’re implicitly saying you don’t understand that saying “x is my heroin” outloud means you’re addicted to something instead of admiring it (and that you don’t understand that “hero” is the colloquially used form).

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Which one of the following English sentences would you use to express admiration and adoration of a person?

        “[female celebrity] is my heroine!”

        OR

        “[female celebrity] is my hero!”

        See if you use the first one, as your rhetoric implies you want to, and think everyone should participate in this needless gendering, then you’re implicitly saying you don’t understand that saying “x is my heroin” outloud means you’re addicted to something instead of admiring it (and that you don’t understand that “hero” is the colloquially used form).

        You’re not gonna get the last word. I can repeat my argument, you can only spam “didn’t read lol.” Which do you think looks more ridiculous after a few weeks of this back-and-forth?