• tomi000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That is kind of true. But on the assumption that the corporation (in this case Costco) is doing more good than bad, like generating fair jobs, it would benefit most to see that business grow. If you dont generate profit because you distribute everything to your employees or customers, you will never be able to grow. So Costco will stay with 10 employees forever and only those businesses that exploit workers and customers can grow.

    You could argue that there is really no need for businesses to grow as big ss many are today and I would completely agree, but that has to be regulated by law.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      32 minutes ago

      Non profits are a thing and they are able to grow, hell, you would expect them to grow more because less money goes to the pockets of a CEO and more goes to growing the company.

      It can also make profit without billions going to the pockets of a single person, if that money was just redistributes to all employees the business would probably grow even faster because more qualified people would want to work there and would be happier working there.

      Three scenarios:

      1. The company makes 100B in revenue, pays its employees a fair wage, distributes 5B to the C-suites and makes 50B in total profit

      2. The company makes 100B in revenues, pays its employees a fair wage, distributes 10M to the C-suites, distributes 9.99B in bonus to all employees and makes 50B in total profit

      3. The company reduces its prices, makes 95.01B in revenues, pays its employees a fair wage, gives 10M to the c-suites, makes 50B in total profit

      What’s the difference?

      Hint: there’s no difference except the number of people being treated better