• LucozadeBottle1pCoin@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s kind of weird but Tottenham literally always overperform xG basically since it became a stat. Part of it was Kane, but Son is actually statistically a better finisher.

    It’s an interesting counter for people who say that xG tells you who ‘should’ win a game, because this is more than a trend it’s almost an inevitability. In theory it’s no different to a team that has great creativity and crap finishing, but one will show up as a great team on xG and one won’t.

      • Hufftey@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not saying this as a biased spurs fan but considering he’s been with us 8 years and I could probably count on 1 hand the amount of “sitters” he’s missed, he’s an extremely clinical finisher. He just always scores when he gets a chance that you would expect him to score. There’s no other player I’d feel more comfortable running through on goal in a 1 on 1 situation

    • tobyornottoby2366@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s still probably the best, simple metric for assessing a team’s quality at a glance. At the end of the day it shows you how well a team creates goal scoring opportunities and how it prevents goal conceding opportunities, everything else is down to shot stopping and finishing (in theory).

      I think it’d be mostly fair to say it shows who ‘plays the best football’, less whether a team is actually effective at playing football.

      • LucozadeBottle1pCoin@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is there a difference between playing good football and playing effective football? Is a team that creates a lot of chances and can barely finish any of them any better than a team that creates few chances but can normally finish them?

      • LukeHanson1991@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not just down to shot stopping and shooting. It’s also about the quality of the assists and the position of the defence.

        I still agree it is the best simple metric to predict how teams will perform over a season. VfB Stuttgart in the Bundesliga for example will probably finish really high. I would bet top 6.

        • tobyornottoby2366@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Absolutely, though aren’t assist quality and defensive positioning both factors that influence xG and xGA? That’s kind of my thinking when saying why it’s a good metric.