I have no horse in this race, just here to say ‘per game’ stats are awful because they count someone coming on as a sub as having played the same amount as someone who played the full 90 minutes. It’s why practically every reputable stat company uses ‘per 90’.
Musiala still has better per 90 stats according to FBref though fwiw.
![[Transfermarkt] Top 10 most valuable players in the world](https://alien.top/pictrs/image/ef72ac38-d224-4fcb-8a6f-642b861542f3.webp){kind=link}
If he can pass a ball he’s already better than Musiala
Musiala has better pass completion(85.9%) and more progressive passes(5.24p90) than Foden(82.0% & 4.57p90).
Bambi last Bundesliga season:
Foden last Premier League season:
Foden has one more accurate pass per game. Musiala is better at literally everything else.
In comparison, Bellingham last Bundesliga season:
Disingenuous to use those stats and avoid providing minutes played, LOL
Musiala played almost 2200 mins in league; Foden just over 1800
I have no horse in this race, just here to say ‘per game’ stats are awful because they count someone coming on as a sub as having played the same amount as someone who played the full 90 minutes. It’s why practically every reputable stat company uses ‘per 90’.
Musiala still has better per 90 stats according to FBref though fwiw.
I see a quite egocentric player who just refuses to pass a lot of the time. He’s like Robben without the end product.
2nd most G+A in the Bundesliga last season lol.
In a season where the top scorer had a massive amount of 16 goals. Ever since the world cup his end product has been massively lacking.
Thanks these stats will be useful for my anti Foden agenda