115 - 116 |
Box Scores: NBA & Yahoo |
GAME SUMMARY |
Location: Chase Center(0) |
Officials: Eric Dalen, Jacyn Goble and Sha’Rae Mitchell |
Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sacramento Kings | 23 | 33 | 33 | 26 | 115 |
Golden State Warriors | 22 | 27 | 27 | 40 | 116 |
TEAM STATS |
Team | PTS | FG | FG% | 3P | 3P% | FT | FT% | OREB | TREB | AST | PF | STL | TO | BLK |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sacramento Kings | 115 | 43-93 | 46.2% | 12-40 | 30% | 17-24 | 70.8% | 8 | 49 | 23 | 21 | 10 | 13 | 6 |
Golden State Warriors | 116 | 45-88 | 51.1% | 16-31 | 51.6% | 10-15 | 66.7% | 7 | 56 | 31 | 21 | 8 | 22 | 3 |
PLAYER STATS |
[1](https://f1uk3r.github.io/rnbapgtgenerator/) ^by ^/u/f1uk3r |
rnbapgtgenerator ↩︎
Casters all night “The Kings are taking this so seriously. They really want to win.” Warriors put starters back in and crickets.
They just loved Chris Paul’s flops, they even acknowledged how he exaggerated contact and how smart of a move it was.
both teams were taking it seriously, both starter played same amount of minutes
That’s my point. The announcers for the game were rough.
Warriors starters still played less minutes than kings lol
31min vs 34min is not really substantial enough to to be commented on. It’s fine to mention benched starters though.
So what’s the big deal about putting starters back in at end of game? They still played less than kings starters, brining it up is kinda disingenuous is all I’m saying. You guys making my point for me.
How painful it must be, being a warriors fan. To never hear what an objective announcer sounds like. To always flinch at the slightest criticism of your team.
What are you talking about?