Reddit’s blockchain-based “Community Points” rewards crash after sunsetting::Tokens based on subreddit reputation saw dips over 85% after the announcement.

  • micka190@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It doesn’t.

    Crypto bros are really fond of the whole “use the blockchain to take your assets from one platform to another” grift, but it:

    1. Doesn’t work if the other platform doesn’t support it
    2. Could be done without a blockchain if both platforms agree to share a database

    It’s like you said: Do any other websites care about your Reddit karma? No. Why would they? It’s only 2 uses are to make people addicted to Reddit through gamifying their opinions and filtering bot accounts by having a minimal karma threshold to post on subs.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is basically the issue of almost every hypothetical use of the blockchain that advocates throw around.

      “You could move all your skins from Counterstrike to Valorant?”

      OK. Putting aside the unbelievably complex technical and practical issues, why would either Valve or Riot want this? In this scenario Valve is making it easier for their customers to leave, and Riot is effectively giving you a bunch of cool skins for free.

      These people watched Ready Player One, totally ignored the part where the entire premise was “One single corporation controls basically all interactive media and that’s really bad” and decided that this sounded like a cool idea.

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        Basically every software engineer laughed their ass off once they realized they were serious about that stuff.

        It just shows such an intense lack of understanding of how software and business works. Thinking that blockchain is just some magic powder that can bring their wishes to reality.

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s what happens when the only use case for a tech product is its ability to interest venture capital.

          We’re seeing the same thing now with “AI”

          • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Eh, no, I’m going to disagree with you there.

            Yes, AI is trendy, hyped, and a buzzword at the moment, but at the core of it there really is a very useful and practical technology (and it’s also much more varied than just LLMs). Take for the fact that generative AI is actually being used in practice, to do more or less what it was advertised to.

            • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re right to say that generative AI has at least some practical applications. That’s a valid distinction as compared to crypto, and it’s exactly why the venture capital world pivoted to it so hard.

              However if you compare how these companies are selling their technology to what it actually does, the gulf is astonishing. Almost every story of a company actually trying to use this tech has been a disaster. And what we hear from advocates is the constant refrain of “It’s early days”, but that’s exactly what we heard about crypto and distributed blockchain for over a decade. Meanwhile a lot of the experts are increasingly of the opinion that most of the proposed applications of AI will never reach the point where the tech actually works as advertised. Sooner or later, it’s gonna recommend a food bank as a tourist destination. And human validation isn’t going to solve this because inattentional blindness is a thing.

              I do think that there are probably, eventually, real uses for this tech, but we’re clearly no where near them yet. Right now it’s still all just magic beans.

              • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You need to be more specific than just say “AI” here. Experts do not say that AI will never reach a point of true general intelligence, but they may say that LLMs cannot do that.

                AI is a big field, and it has seen massive improvements over time. Sure, don’t oversell its current capabilities, but we don’t really know where the current path leads. Current AI is already plenty impressive.

                • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes, I’m aware. I thought that could have been easily inferred from context, given the topic of conversation. That’s, y’know, how conversation works. We’re not writing essays here.

      • Moneo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The more obvious flaw is not why would they want to do it but why would they want to do it with blockchain.

        • Roboticide@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly! And it’s not like crossover content doesn’t happen between publishers already without blockchain. Look at Fortnite. All it takes is a promo code.