To the old heads and massive basketball junkies here. Was MJ so good at his peak you would rather have him than any two superstars at the time? For example would a team rather have MJ than a Hakeem and Barkley at their peaks?
To the old heads and massive basketball junkies here. Was MJ so good at his peak you would rather have him than any two superstars at the time? For example would a team rather have MJ than a Hakeem and Barkley at their peaks?
If you are giving MJ the supporting cast of the 96-97 Bulls, then yes, I think I would take him (and that team), over a 96-97 bulls team without MJ, but with two other 90’s super stars.
If his supporting cast sucked, then I think the power of two superstars would be too much advantage.