• Kingofthezyx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    What would stop owners from shifting the burden to the renters?

    As of right now this is already how property taxes are handled by most landlords: mortgage + tax + est. cost to fix incidentals + time managing paperwork = rent (in a fair situation - though most will tack on as much extra for “profit” as they can)

    So if you have a house worth 600k (12k tax), the mortgage is $3500/mo, they would just charge $4500+ a month to cover their costs.

    I think the only way is to add extremely progressive property tax to multiple ownerships, and a name always has to be attached as “owner”. So your first house and second might have limited property taxes, but your third would be double, fourth would be quadruple, fifth would be 8x etc.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My example is already an extremely progressive property tax on multiple ownership, but yeah, it can be tailored as needed.

      I, personlly, would be in favor of doubling the tax if no one is living there.

      As for rent: the price of rent cannot be arbitrarily raised. If renters can buy more cheaply than renting, then landlords will have empty units.

      So in your example, renters would just buy and pay the $3500 mortgage instead of renting.

      Of course real life is more complex. Renters need access to financing, etc.

    • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m glad we currently don’t have this tax system in place otherwise rents would be absurd and growing right now!