• treefrog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    He’s not using the I didn’t know it was wrong defense (that was earlier) but the my lawyers told me it was fine defense (his previous lawyers, not these two).

    So, I don’t think these statements matter to his current defensive strategy.

    • CheezyWeezle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honest question, is that a defense that has ever actually worked for crimes this serious? I can understand something like “Your honor, I totally thought I could park there because a police officer said it was fine, but then the parking enforcement wrote me a ticket!” But not “Your honor, a very Bigly smart man said I could totally disenfranchise all of America and it is very cool and very legal!”

      • treefrog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It can work but probably won’t in this instance. There was an article about it posted yesterday that talked about it.

        I think his actual strategy is to delay as much as possible and either have his own AG drop the charges, or, have a GOP president pardon him.

    • willsenior@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      If he uses advice of counsel defense, he has to waive attorney client privilege. Seems like a nice trap by special counsel.

      • thrawn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was a trap by the special counsel set by… getting him to hire terrible attorneys? I would think that more a consequence of the magnitude of his crimes + his history of nonpayment, leaving only desperate lawyers willing to be the next in line trying to defend one of the most obvious criminals in recent history and humiliating themselves in the process