Donald J. Musk@lemmy.today to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 19 hours agoTrump Administration Argues a Judge's Verbal Order Is 'Not Enforceable'www.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up154arrow-down114
arrow-up140arrow-down1external-linkTrump Administration Argues a Judge's Verbal Order Is 'Not Enforceable'www.newsweek.comDonald J. Musk@lemmy.today to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 19 hours agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squareSwordgeek@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up26·18 hours agoMaybe you missed it, but he has declared complete lawlessness for himself and his cronies. He’s not asking, he has already declared it.
minus-squareTony Bark@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down5·18 hours agoI know what he meant. That’s why I said, “if we take to it’s logical extreme.”
minus-squaremiss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·17 hours agoLemmy demands an “/s”.
minus-squareTony Bark@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·edit-217 hours agoOkay, fine. Here’s a question. If he says a verbal court order isn’t enforceable, why should we follow SCOTUS’ or any lower courts? He is already dismantling systems that not only oversaw what he did, but everyone else.
minus-squarefloofloof@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3·17 hours agoBecause the laws will be enforced if you break them, assuming you’re not rich, but not if he breaks them.
Maybe you missed it, but he has declared complete lawlessness for himself and his cronies.
He’s not asking, he has already declared it.
I know what he meant. That’s why I said, “if we take to it’s logical extreme.”
Lemmy demands an “/s”.
Okay, fine. Here’s a question. If he says a verbal court order isn’t enforceable, why should we follow SCOTUS’ or any lower courts? He is already dismantling systems that not only oversaw what he did, but everyone else.
Because the laws will be enforced if you break them, assuming you’re not rich, but not if he breaks them.