He’s cooking right now. Points, rebounds and blocks.

only his 2nd year but he was 13th pick last season. Was high on him after last season and he seems to have taken a jump.

Thoughts about him so far this season?

stats: 18.0 points, 15.3 rebounds, 4.0 assists, 2.3 blocks

  • believemedude@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Disagree. I agree that more volume and better stats shouldn’t automatically make you an MIP but some dudes look like completely different players from year one to two

    • nikop@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A big leap from year one to year two is expected though. The award should be reserved for players who break through after everyone thought they’d plateaued, kind of like Markkanen or Randle or Brunson.

      • drypaint77@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But you’re just making up your own definition. The award isn’t “most unexpected improved player”, who said players who are expected to improve shouldn’t be eligible?

        • NotChasingThese@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d say historically the MIP award has just been “the biggest surprise” and to many a second year improvement isn’t surprising

          Maybe that doesn’t line up exactly with the name of the award but you can’t deny that’s how it’s been interpreted through the years

          • drypaint77@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            How? It’s called “most improved player” so the player who improved the most should be awarded, it’s literally in the name. Nowhere does it say it has to be a surprise.