• huppakee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    If they’d ban Temu, which they currently don’t seem to have legal ground for, Temu would just stop printing their logo on the labels. New sender address, done. It’s not like the follow laws now anyway. They also lie about the value of packages to avoid paying import taxes.

      • huppakee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Then it again comes down to volume. It’d be lot of work, so EU would need to spend money. I don’t think they consider it a big enough problem (yet).

        • FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          They could do:

          • Keep current rate of random checks
          • Whenever an infringing product is detected, ban exporter
          • That way, from then on, all automated checks trash that exporter. (I’m thinking integration with the postal service)

          Hopefully it’ll be a pain in their arse to some extent

          • huppakee@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            It might work, but the EU doesn’t have a central entry point / organisation handling the mail so the legislation needs to be airtight if you want this to be effective.