• NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    193
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, I don’t want to work longer hours. I can literally accomplish the same amount in 4 days as I do in a 5 day work week. What is this obsession with always being more productive anyway? We have improved efficiency and production like 300% (probably more) since the early 1900s, and we are still expected to be wage slaves. That’s dog shit corporate bullshit propaganda.

    • Rinox@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tbf the working conditions and life conditions have improved enormously since the tge early 1900s. Just remember that the early 1900s was still a Victorian era hellscape in regards to working conditions, with child labor, no rights whatsoever, no protections, 18 hours work days until you dropped dead at 40 if you were lucky.

      That being said, the issue is that in many cases production has gone up by 300% since the 90s, with no meaningful change in working conditions, just a reduction in personnel. A change is needed and this 4 day work week movement is a good thing.

    • mtdyson_01@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The extra productivity just increased profits for the company and raise the stock price for investors. The ability to use less manpower increased profits and stock shares. Slowing pay and benefits advancements for the workers increased profits for the company and shareholders.

      Companies don’t take the view of all we need to do is break even every year it’s about making more and more money every year. The actual people who put the work in to make those profits mean nothing to upper management and the shareholders they are all replaceable.

      If the stock market and mega corporations were gone and there were only small regional privately owned companies you would see a huge difference in workers lives.

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Right. It’s about incentives. I’m not going to work harder for more hours, but offer me more money or less hours and let’s talk.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I used to think the same thing. But it turns out, we’ve all been convinced into being wage slaves our entire lives for jobs that don’t really matter.

        Funny enough, the least skilled jobs that we found out are the most important during the pandemic are the ones nobody wants to pay well for.

        What’s even more ironic is that we’ve been convinced to do all of this while destroying the planet and every ecosystem on it.

        One day we’ll wake up and be old, and realize we spent our entire life working instead of doing the things that are actually important in life.

        You know, that, or the climate will break down, not sure which one will happen first since climate breakdown is happening faster every year.

        • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Speak for yourself. I work as an electrician at a hydropower plant. I suppose you could debate whether my job role matters or not, but if you like that your kettle, TV, phone and everything else that requires electricity works, then I think you’d be hard pushed.

          I do agree strongly that some of the worst paid jobs are the most valuable. One of the best things to come out of the pandemic was a big push for unionism and I hope it stays that way.

          Unfortunately in our current society, we need to work. I quite like the idea of not being destitute when I reach retirement age. I’d love to spend all my time following my passions but I need to be realistic.

          The climate problem is interesting. Some countries are moving towards being CO2 neutral. I hope that others will follow them and it won’t be too late.

          • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Speak for yourself.

            I’m an aerospace engineer, and my role is critical to the success of our project. Actually, I haven’t worked a professional job where that wasn’t the case. You’re not going to change my mind about how our society is structured. We’ve all been duped into participating in a system that is pushing us to extinction, and it’s insane

            • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I could argue that we’d get by without planes. There are many much more environmentally friendly modes of travel.

              Now you tell me how we get by without electricity, especially from sources that are environmentally friendly.

                • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Your being facetious and not arguing in good faith.

                  We could get by in our modern lives with very little impact to the average persons life with no planes.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Other sacrifices that Gen Z and millennial employees say they’d make in exchange for a four-day workweek include working longer hours (48%), changing jobs or companies (35%), working weekends or evenings (27%) and even taking a pay cut (13%).

    If people can be as productive with a four-day workweek (and other surveys and studies have shown this to be the case), there should be no need for workers to sacrifice anything.

    Realistically, employers should be the ones sacrificing to keep productive staff happy, including giving them a four-hour workweek with no strings attached.

    • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tbh if we got a four day work week we would have more time to think about and advocate for the things we want anyway. A pay cut would be temporary.

    • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      If people are as productive in 4 days as they are in 5 days, I don’t see how the employer would be sacrificing anything at all. They would just be saving a day of office lighting bills.

      • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        The employer will see that you “could” be doing more work, since you accomplish everything in 4 hours. “You don’t have enough work to occupy your time”, they’d say in my country.

        That’s why people act busy. Because when you’re efficient, you get punished with more work.

        • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is true. My company has afternoons off in the summer (4.5 day work weeks). Basically they acknowledge that no one is doing anything after lunch on a Friday.

          The same amount of actual work gets done. It’s actually more efficient because no one is coming up with useless meetings and busywork.

  • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Despite the popular belief that younger generations are champions of remote work, one-third of Gen Z and millennial workers say they’d be willing to work fully in-person if it meant shaving a day off of their workweek.

    [. . .]

    Other sacrifices that Gen Z and millennial employees say they’d make in exchange for a four-day workweek include working longer hours (48%), changing jobs or companies (35%), working weekends or evenings (27%) and even taking a pay cut (13%)

    Translation:

    • 67% would not switch from remote to in-person
    • 52% would not work longer hours
    • 65% would not change jobs
    • 73% would not work evenings/weekends
    • 87% would not take a pay cut
    • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fuckin based honestly. I thought they would ask for less compromise, but if they’re gonna go for the gut we’d better just tell them how it is. Less hours are proven to make better working happier more productive and cooperative employees. They’re just potentially less compliant.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hey, studies show 8/4 wouldn’t appreciably lower productivity. Why the fuck should I give my employer anything else?

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck no, I will not budge an inch. Those C Suite motherfuckers stroll on in here for 25 hours a week. Fuck them and fuck the author of this article. I’ll burn my workplace to the ground before I compromise for a 4-day work week.

  • Damaskox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve heard that Sweden did a research about 6 hours long work day (not the same thing as less work days I know).
    The results were simply that the workers were more happy and more efficient.

    • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      People just tune out after a while, and looking busy is not the same as being busy. Management just doesn’t want to get that.

      • unfreeradical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They get it, but to them the only good worker is one who is well controlled.

        If a work week of thirty two hours would be proved equally productive as one of forty, if most in society would be caused no harm from such a reduction, then workers may begin shortly after to consider a twenty hour work week.

        Then, while considered the new objective, workers also may be discovering new opportunities for self care and community care, developing new relationships with hobbies and leisure, and expanding their identities into new facets and in new directions.

        After not too much time would pass, a critical mass of workers might start to feel convinced that the whole system is a house of cards, built only on threat and deception, and deserving be dismantled in favor of one that is new and different.

    • Gyoza Power@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Personally I would much prefer to have a 6h work day or 6,5 hour (for it to be 32h, like the 4-day work week) than to have 8 hours a day for 4 days. I don’t care about having one more day of free time if I still don’t have as much time during 4 days of the week. I would much rather work less time those 5 days so that I actually have time to cook, exercise and do my shit every single day.

      • unfreeradical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Either is just as good as the other, in the grand scheme.

        Just keep taking away cards, one and then another, until the whole house falls.

    • hubobes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I work 7h a day, some day soon I will go to 6.5. I would always choose that over a 4 day work week. Because now I have actual evenings where I can do things. 7 days a week.

  • BoofStroke@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    4 days. 6 hour day is full time. 24 hour work week is where we should be.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly I spend more down time at my job then I ever had in my life. Even though my job can’t be done at home we literally could be open only 6 hours a day and still make the same amount of money.

      This how much free time I have. I have read 32 John Grisham novels in the Last two months that is peepered in with other novels. It’s ridiculous the amount of commuting tolls and gas I pay and I might altogether work literally 3 of the 9 hours I am at work.

  • bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    I work an extremely physical job. I get home on friday, basically become a vegetable, saturday is a blur if I go out an do anything, and I just start to feel rested and like I want to get up and do stuff on sunday. Of course, i have to go to bed early to make my commute the next day. 2 days off is flat out not enough, and I would really prefer to not give up other aspects of my life just to have free time I can actually take advantage of.

    This works in Netherlands and a number of other European countries, without cutting pay. We should be able to figure it out. Should.

    • Papergeist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I smell ya! I used to work 12 hour shifts of manual labor. First day off was always spent with a huge headache. What a waste.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I always thought our inexplicable youth was owed to all the Avocado toast we snarf down instead of buying houses.

      • unfreeradical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Millennials is just the name for the group despised by Boomers, and Boomers is just the name for the group despised by Millennials. Otherwise, either term is completely meaningless.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Five years older than me? Tell me, what was it like working by candlelight to invent electricity with only the warm sound of eight tracks to keep you steady at night? Was Millard Fillmore as awesome as people say? Did you prefer having a coffee with Oscar Wilde or Cleopatra?

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why does this sound like it’s all made up? lol. I wouldn’t do any of those things for shaving off one day. I don’t want to just switch miseries.

  • Damaskox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I also have noticed that I start wanting something extra from life after a few months of 8h/5d/w.
    Nowadays I’m looking for my optimal limits. How much can I do work and still consider myself having enough free time?

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Despite the popular belief that younger generations are champions of remote work, one-third of Gen Z and millennial workers say they’d be willing to work fully in-person if it meant shaving a day off of their workweek.

    How does paying to commute four days a week versus five days fully remote make any sense? It’s still 80% of the cost and time of commuting.

    • gacorley@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Note that this is one third. And there are people who live close enough to their workplace that it wouldn’t add much burden.