"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 10 days agoChoose a number, 1-5!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square441fedilinkarrow-up1548arrow-down131
arrow-up1517arrow-down1imageChoose a number, 1-5!lemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 10 days agomessage-square441fedilink
minus-squareUriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up35·10 days ago2, assuming the broad pommel is a counterweight. If it’s flimsy lightweight material then none of them.
minus-squarehansolo@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·10 days agoAll of this is exactly right. #2 is the least cringe-inducing because of the lumpy bottom. Is this fork thing an official diagnosis metric? Or just not yet?
minus-squareAA5B@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-210 days ago2 has the best tines but that huge duckbill handle is a non-starter. 5 has the best handle
minus-squareBurninator05@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·10 days agoFive is out because its outer tines are curved. There is no reason for that and that is why I hate it. One, however, is the best. I find it eat slower (and often less) if my silverware isn’t the size of a pitchfork.
2, assuming the broad pommel is a counterweight. If it’s flimsy lightweight material then none of them.
Getting aboard the #2 train
Yeah, longest tines wins.
All of this is exactly right. #2 is the least cringe-inducing because of the lumpy bottom.
Is this fork thing an official diagnosis metric? Or just not yet?
2 has the best tines but that huge duckbill handle is a non-starter. 5 has the best handle
deleted by creator
Five is out because its outer tines are curved. There is no reason for that and that is why I hate it.
One, however, is the best. I find it eat slower (and often less) if my silverware isn’t the size of a pitchfork.