• freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Funny, why don’t you name the law and let people look it up and read what it actually says? Are you talking about S.146, a bill to prohibit the nonconsensual online publication of intimate visual depictions of individuals, and requiring platforms to remove it upon request?

    So in other words, if someone posts nudes of you online and you object to it, this law would require the site to take it down upon your requesting it… is THAT the censorship you are crying about??

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You mean the one that’s so vaguely worded that it can be used by the government to silence anything and remove free speech?

      Why didn’t you publish the entire full text of the bill here and all the possible outcomes along with a bunch of news articles listing pros and cons of such thing?

      Christ, if you think that’s crying please don’t ever have kids.