Your Windows 10 PC will soon be ‘junk’ - users told to resist Microsoft deadline::If you’re still using Windows 10 and don’t want to upgrade to Windows 11 any time soon you might want to sign a new online petition

    • moonburster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      11 months ago

      My PC doesn’t hit the requirements for windows 11. Yet it kept asking me to update. Been running Ubuntu ever since

      • warmaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Same here, but I moved to Arch because I wanted the latest drivers, at the beggining with GNOME, but then moved to KDE to get the newest Wayland stuff related to Gaming.

          • warmaster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            No harder than any other distro, I came from Windows, distrohopped between 10 distros, and settled on Crystal Linux (arch based), after learning that KDE was better for gaming, I switched to Manjaro out of ignorance that Crystal already offered that DE.

    • bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Try it on an external drive. I did that a couple years ago just to fool around and see if I liked it, within a week it was my main OS and I’ve barely used Windows since.

          • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            11 months ago

            Almost a year here! Working great! (No, for real, modern desktop Linux experience is surprisingly refined, it’s more stable and performant than Windows!)

            • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              11 months ago

              And I never did. I just started with Linux Mint when I got my first laptop.

              But I do see the perspective of Windows users, perhaps. I did briefly try using Windows, but it was frustrating. I don’t know how to set anything in there. For some reason there’s 2 setting apps (control panel and settings), each only being partially usable. My Wi-Fi kept dying, the only solution was replacing the Intel Wi-Fi card for one from Qualcomm. Bluetooth only worked randomly like every 20th restart. Drivers for my 20 year old printer didn’t work in either 10 nor 11. Only up to Windows 7.
              Painful experience.

              • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Yeah, when they went from 7 to 10 (there’s no 9 for horrible hacky reasons, and 8 was the mandatory half-baked test-run of the next proper version), they tried to redo the aesthetics of those systems to be more touch-input styled, but they only half-did it. If you want anything more advanced than the settings app gives you, you need to dig into the control panel. Then there’s the deeper settings - device manager, computer management, startup services, firewall, the registry, and on and on, all of which are designed entirely differently and many of which haven’t seen any update since windows 2000 at least. I wouldn’t be surprised if some went back further. It all speaks to ancient legacy code nobody wants to touch and the unfathomable depths of technical debt that implies. I get the sense the settings app change is another in a long line of updates that became legacy and added yet another layer to this byzantine system.

                Then there’s the lovecraftian user permissions system that seems like it layers three levels of abstraction that you have to utterly master to get literally anything done and which I have given up trying to understand. If I need permissions, I run a third party batch file that assigns complete ownership of everything in a folder to me, and then I don’t think about the consequences.

                I really want to move to Linux, but I’ve gotten burnt out on attempting and not being able to do all of the many things I’m used to on Windows. I’ve been hearing good things about it lately and I may just have the energy to try again soon.

                • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I wish you a good luck! And don’t hesitate to ask - often times it’s very simple, actually!

              • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Wow, a real Linux native here! Wonderful to know.

                Yes, I gotta say after running Linux for like a week I seriously couldn’t think of coming back to Windows. I just began to understand how much of a trash Windows systems are.

            • Aermis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Yeah but I use my pc to play games. And to read all the Linux coping strategies to run modern games with software bypasses or strategies… I don’t need to jailbreak and run through 150 pages of forums and guides so I can play my steam games.

              • rasensprenger@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                11 months ago

                I have ~200 games in my steam library, all of which run by pressing “play” in steam. I may just accidentally like games that run on linux, but running through 150 pages of forums definitely isn’t the norm nowadays

                • Aermis@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Well I was playing starfield when considering dabbling in running Linux and I got shy reading how to run it on Linux, let alone any of my other games.

              • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                Majority of games are launched as easy as pressing play in steam, or even just launching the .exe with regular Wine. Software bypasses are mostly a thing of the past. I’m saying this as a gamer.

      • voxel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I’ve been using linux on my secondary machine for a couple of years now and I don’t really feel the need to use Windows anymore.
        all of my software just works and my workflow is cross-platform (I don’t really care about which os I’m using, i can get things done regardless); but as a software developer I’d much rather use linux than spend my time managing like 6 virtual linux/unix-like environments on windows. (wsl, msys2, etc)
        All of the games I care about actually work slightly better on linux than on windows. (and a single click away from installing and launching from steam); also Steam Big Picture mode and gamepad support (dualshock 4) is much better on linux than on Windows 10, on windows some features only work over Bluetooth. i use arch btw

        • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          I made the switch to Linux Host OS 5 years ago and haven’t looked back. Plus the fact that Cyberpunk 2077 works with an RTX card and wireless game controller out of the box is enough to keep me interested for now.

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I made the switch to linux when Win7 died, cause Win10 is a giant PoS and I refused to ugrade to it, lol.

          Hopped a few Distros before settling on Nobara, which has given me the best “It just works” gaming experience.

  • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    133
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I mean, it won’t let me. Windows Update inists my PC doesn’t meet the minimum spec, and I’m not inclined to argue with it.

    • teejay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You can use Rufus to install windows 11 and bypass the requirements. It does everything for you – downloads the latest win 11 service pack, removes the blocking requirements, and you can even tell it to automatically disable all of the telemetry and phoning home. You’ll still need a license key when you install, or run it on a machine that was running a valid win 10 install previously. But I’m running win 11 on an 8 year old PC with zero issues.

      Here is a good guide that explains in detail.

      • ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I would like to point out that this is exactly the same difficulty of just installing linux, without freeing you from microserfdom.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          The problem for me is that I basically only use my PC for gaming and YouTube.

          I know SOME games work, but I don’t want to add to the list of games I can’t play because they’re console/windows only. :/

          • ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I have the exact same use case for my PC and have no issues gaming on Linux for the vast majority of games. The caveat, however, is that anti-cheat can be problematic, so if you exclusively play games with anti-cheat that could be a problem for you. The only titles I have issues with are competitive shooters.

          • Hexarei@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            We’ve long since transitioned into the “most” games work territory. Basically apart from anything with rootkit-like anti cheat, you shouldn’t have any trouble playing games at all.

        • teejay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Comparing the level of effort to run windows vs Linux is a whole other thing I’m definitely not getting into. I use Linux for work and run it on two machines at home, but I also use my Windows box for games. You can use and enjoy both, it doesn’t have to be a religious war.

          • ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            I highly recommend you attempt to run your games on a Linux box, as the experience has improved vastly. I also keep a Windows install around for the odd game that doesn’t work in Linux (basically just a couple competitive shooters that I enjoy), but the number of times I need to boot into my Windows partition are diminishing day by day. Definitely did not mean to be a zealot about it, but going through the effort outlined above just so you can get Windows updates from a company that clearly doesn’t care if they trash your machine forcing your upgrade seems foolish to me.

      • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        TPM. Probably switched off in the BIOS or something.

        Don’t care, don’t like what I’ve seen of 11, happy to wait until I’m forced to change.

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Fun fact: Linux is so customizable that you can run a modern GUI and software on 46mb of ram and a CPU from 1989. Don’t let Microshit tell you to throw out your old PC, it’s truly surprising what’s possible.

    • Dran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah but can it run signed drm in a way that the owner of the computer can’t read the keys? Checkmate atheists.

    • Crismus@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yep. Gaming is starting to work on Linux, so I will move to Linux once Microsoft cancels 10.

      11 has nothing more than more telemetry and tracking going for it. Gaming is slower, so why would I upgrade for a worse experience.

      I play old games still anyways. Linux is more secure than Windows 11 anyways. I won’t upgrade to 11, and turned off TPM in BIOS so 11 won’t automatically install.

          • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Most anticheat software actually runs on Linux! Even the previously stubborn EasyAntiCheat got its Linux-compatible version.

        • spudwart@spudwart.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Most modern games can work. But this is a dev issue, not a “wait until it works on linux” issue

          EAC, and BattleEye both work on Linux, all the dev has to do is tick a “Proton Compatible” checkbox. Which many publishers/devs, namely Epic, don’t do because they hate linux with a red hot passion for some unknown reason.

          • spudwart@spudwart.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Oh yes, another “No, I refuse to check the box” devs/publishers. Literally the company that made BattleEye compatible with Proton won’t enable the damn thing on their most popular game. There just needs to be a big enough outcry. Which as 10 hits EOL and the SteamDeck continues to sell; this will happen.

        • Crismus@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          What I meant was that it is starting to get simple to play games using Linux now.

          I’m not a teenager anymore who enjoys getting games to work by editing settings outside of games like during the Win 3.11 and MS-DOS days.

          After decades working IT jobs I don’t want to do work when I’m trying to relax. Linus will have a nearly seamless system when Win 10 reaches EOL.

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Next computer of mine will definitely be running Linux. Only thing I’d ever need windows for is some oddly specific software that won’t work on Linux because I’m too dumb to get working properly.

  • DingoBilly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Lmao. This article is junk. Yew I’m sure millions of people are going to suddenly dump their PC’s because they don’t get security updates. Most people don’t follow this at all and don’t care.

    And no, they’re not going to magically jump to Linux as much as the Lemmy circlejerk loves to believe. If they know enough about security they probably already have looked into Linux and decided against it.

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 months ago

      The article is typical clickbait from the Express, that’s bottom of the barrel trash.

    • MuuuaadDib@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Companies are a tad different and this could be a big problem with adhering to security and patches. It’s a big problem with companies doing this engineered obsolescence (stares at Apple) and making products that work trash.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        If there’s one thing I’ve learned about banks during my time as a developer, it’s that they’re on the oldest version of windows they can get to run.

      • spudwart@spudwart.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        This, many businesses will consider Linux for various devices.

        It’ll likely start as “Oh we can use it to deploy for, this this and this, and avoid putting Windows here and here, to save X dollars” as certain applications in business are not available on Linux, but others will be. It will be a slow transition in the business world. But they will do it.

      • EpeeGnome@lemmy.fmhy.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        When asked to choose between convenience and security, a lot of people will choose convenience. Staying on the computer you already have as long as it seems to work fine is very convenient. I still occasionally see computers running Windows 7 for no reason other than that the owner can’t be bothered to make a change.

        • K0W4L5K1@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Those people are lazy and really not thinking about their security imo but whatever its their data not mine

  • LainOfTheWired@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    As I Linux user I can’t wait for the flood of cheap perfectly good hardware from these idiots

  • M500@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    11 months ago

    There is no way they don’t offer extended support for Windows 10. Many PCs can’t get to windows 11. Imagine all the malware infected machines that will be out there.

    • Punkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I worked for a large computer company in the late 90s, early 2000s. When XP came out, they said there would be no site licensing. This meant we had to keep track of license keys for thousands upon thousands of systems, costing millions. This was before KMS or anything.

      “Nothing we can do,” Microsoft said. “We have no gate key.”

      Our server farms at the time were 40% Windows NT 4, 55% Sun systems, and 5% Linux. So we said, “okay,” and called Red Hat. In a year, our back end was 60% Sun, 35% Linux, and 5% Windows NT. We were already in talks to start switching to Linux workstations for desktops.

      “Oh, you mean this gate key,” said Microsoft.

      Asshats. They lost our server business, but let us use XP with a site license.

    • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I assume eventually they’ll drop the UEFI security requirement, which is why 90% of the “can’t” cases occur.

      • Dran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        11 months ago

        Uefi isn’t the push, the push is tpm 2.0, which I think is a much much larger percentage of “incompatibilities”. tpm allows for drm that is much harder to bypass, since the random number generator operates securely in hardware. It’s for their benefit not yours.

      • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        My Windows install is still in compatibility mode. It’s the sole reason I can’t upgrade to 11, not that I want to. I can’t be bothered to reinstall Windows on UEFI when there’s no point anyway. I’ll happily stick to 10.

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Dude what ad ridden hellscape is that site, ublock pinged 45 ads on that page just on load lol

  • K0W4L5K1@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    11 months ago

    The day i had ads on my start page i immidiately uninstalled windows. I installed some linux distro its been like three years and ive finally settled on arch. it was hard but fuck ads on the start page and i feel smarter for it

    • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      When you swap distros, how do you manage all your files and settings? Do you just save your files externally and start from scratch every time you change a distro?

      • CeeBee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        how do you manage all your files and settings?

        I don’t. I just use a separate drive for /home. And since I just prefer KDE no matter which system I’m using, all my files, settings, layouts, panels, etc are exactly the same whenever I switch out the OS.

      • sonnenzeit@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Typically your personal files and app settings are stored somewhere in your user home folder, eg under /home/bob/. Ideally you’ve set up your system in a way so that the entire /home/ folder is stored on its own disk or partition at least. That let’s you boot up a different distro while using the same home directory. But even if you haven’t set it up separately from the rest of the system, you can still manually copy all those files.

        Not every single application setting is transferable between distros as they sometimes use different versions but generally it works well. Many apps also let you manually export profiles or settings and reimport them elsewhere later. Or they have online synchronization baked in.

        • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          So in my previous experience I never get prompted to create separate partition, but I have seen others use this method in the past, however this should probably be a step in any Linux install wizard.

          • sonnenzeit@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            It should be offered as an option really.

            One caveat is that you need to think ahead about how much space you want to assign to each partition. You could end up with your /home/ partition being full while the system partition still has plenty. Or vice versa. You can manually readjust the boundaries but it requires some understanding and can’t be done on the fly by a non-technical user. By contrast if everything’s stored on the same partition you never have to worry about this.

            You can, by the way, manually recreate this set up even after the initial set up although it will require lots of free space to shuffle around files (or some external storage to temporarily hold them). Basically what you do is create a new empty partition, copy all your /home/stuff there and then configure your system to always mount that partition as the /home/ directory when it boots. Files are just files after all and the operating system doesn’t really care where they come from as long as the content is correct. Once you got it working you can delete the originals and free up the space to be used otherwise.

      • Meowing Thing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        You can have a separate partition for your files so that you change only your OS. Even with windows. This way you’ll always keep your files and just need to customize your distro and reinstall your apps when you change between distros

      • K0W4L5K1@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah i kept my files on a seperate drive and just wiped the one with the os. for settings i was trying a different distro and desktop enviroment so those where always a bit different and i started from scratch

    • EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I was already using Linux a lot of the time when Windows 7 was out, and seeing Microsoft push ads in the start menu, as well as all the other trash and pointless changes that they included with Windows 8+ just confirmed my decision to leave the Windows ecosystem.

      • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        arch is basic. It’s just minimalise by default.

        It has an amazing wiki, extremely active and helpful user forums, and an installer (i think now) or at least a massively helpfully customised shell for initial setup.

        you can install arch and make it look like mint or whatever easily, then the only difference is pacman and the amazing AUR

      • Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s not like he’s compiling Linux from scratch on day one. Arch is pretty well supported and has a package manager.

      • K0W4L5K1@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Lol i hear this alot about arch users and as a newbie i dont get it. It has been the easiest for me to understand, maybe its the documentation idk i started with endavourOS as well which is a great beginner OS for arch IMO

  • Bandicoot_Academic@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    11 months ago

    Once ALVR becomes even remotly usable on Linux im wiping my windows partition and going full Linux (I’m already using it for everything exept VR)

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      It sounds like they have beta support for Linux, so it seems like it’s getting there.

    • warmaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      The next Steam OS device is supposedly aimed at VR. I can’t imagine it launching without ALVR.

  • danielfgom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    A bit clickbait’y. Windows 10 will still work just fine for another decade at least, even without support.

    In the Enterprise we ran 10+ year old PC’s with XP still on them because the CNC program only runs on XP. No issues but of course you wouldn’t use the internet on that machine.

    Does having support really make a massive difference, especially if you’re running AV anyway? A good AV suite will still be updated for years to come.

    The government sector like hospitals etc will pay for extended support so not to worry.

    It’s only Enterprise that might have an issue because they want patched systems but may not be able to afford Win 10 Enterprise. Especially small to medium business.

    As for the home user, it’s not a massive issue.

    Personally I don’t care because I run Linux exclusively. I only gave win 10 running in a VM for printing. Canon said on the box that the printer supports Linux, then after I bought it, officially stopped all Linux support on their site. The original Ubuntu driver only support black and white. So I’m forced to use Windows in a VM for printing. But it’s not connected to the net so it will fulfill this role forever.

    If you’re a regular home user and don’t use any special proprietary software like Photoshop, I highly recommend you try Linux Mint. It will also breathe new life into your machine

    • mlfh@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not having security patches on a system you do things like go to your banking website on is actually a pretty big deal, and I don’t think it should be dismissed lightly. Also AV is mostly snake oil, and is in no way an adequate substitute for a properly patched OS.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Hi, someone that worked on banking stuff in the past.

        You are not safe, nothing is even half as secure as it should be and you are most likely just using a web based front end puppeteering a much much older system. The browser you are on is normally the second weak point after your own dumb self and I have not even heard of one case (not saying there are none) of a OS related vulnerability with online personal banking.

        • mlfh@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m with you there. It’s all layer upon layer of vulnerability and false security, and then at the bottom of all of it lurks the Ken Thompson hack.

          Still bad advice to tell people it’s okay to use an explicitly vulnerable OS, I think.

      • danielfgom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s not as big a deal as you think because most banking hacks are done via browser vulnerabilities rather than OS vulnerabilities. The exception being if you’ve somehow managed to install a keylogger, in which case the issue is the user and a decent AV should detect and block the keylogger.

        As long as you use a browser that gets the latest updates (Firefox, Vivaldi, Chrome), run a decent AV, and don’t install dodgy software you downloaded from some dodgy site, you should be ok.

        AV is definitely not snake oil. I worked in Enterprise IT and a robust AV alongside other security measures is a must and does catch alot. More than the built in Windows security catches. Plus the AV normally incorporates a virus/malware removal tool which tends to be better than Windows built in tool.

        • mlfh@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Would you advise your enterprise clients that running Windows unpatched is ‘not a big deal as long as you have patched web browsers and AV’? Of course not. Because that’s dangerous advice and could even open you up to legal liability.

          So why would you advise otherwise to home users, who are often more vulnerable in the first place?

          • danielfgom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Because home users are not Enterprise users. They are not nearly as juicy a target.

            • Jako301@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              If we are talking about malware and vulnerabilities, home users are a far bigger and easier target then corps.

              Corporations have a custom firewall, proxy servers, VPN connections for all clients and double safeties for all important processes. While they are an interesting target for big organisations like terrorists and secret services, they have near to no value for the average Internet thiefe. Even if one could get in, there are no bank accounts lying around with money in them.

              Home users have none of that, once you are on their PC you get everything. Sure their bank account will only net you a few thousand on average, but you get it easily.

              • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                What? Why would you get anything from a home user that you would not get from a corporate user? In fact I think you will find they get all the juice from the person (staff) and then extra from the business (and access to more victims).

                You also have to factor in the sad fact that the age of viruses and malware has largely become the age of phishing and scams. People found out you don’t need malware when you can just trick people into giving you access anyway. This endless fear of missing updates is now mostly just marketing.

    • tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      The daily express isn’t exactly known for it’s accurate insightful reporting. The headline is mostly about scaring people, mostly elderly (their main readership) that their computer is about to stop working.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Last winter I ripped my DVD collection to my NAS. Problem: Neither my current daily driver laptop or desktop have optical drives. So I hauled out my father’s OLD Dell XPS. This thing has a Core i7 with three digits in the part number, I think it was built in 2008 or so. Felt like absolute sluggish crap running Windows 10. It feels perfectly modern running Linux Mint. And I have the old box a pretty hot supper ripping and transcoding all those DVDs all winter, but it did it.

      Computers don’t slow down, Windows does.

      • Metal0130@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m running windows 10 on a first Gen i7-930. I’ve upgraded my ram and video card over the years but still on a crappy hdd. Windows isnt lightning fast by any means. But it’s not unbearable. Perhaps my mind will blow when I finally upgrade.

        My pc isn’t eligible for upgrade to eleven. Guess I’m sol then.

    • warmaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Have you tried installing CUPS ? And setting up your printer using the web UI ? Worked for me perfectly for every printer I threw at it.

      • DomoPANTS@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I could not get CUPS working in a docker container for the life of me. So now I have a stupid little CUPS server.

        It does work great, even though it feels like they finished dev in 2003 and never revisited it.

          • DomoPANTS@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Because my main server is running UnRAID and most things are ran in containers. I could probably do it in a VM, but it seemed like more of a hassle and it might have the same discovery issue the container had. Throwing it in an old dying server as a package is what I ended up doing, but I’m not happy about it. 😅

  • Whirling_Cloudburst@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    11 months ago

    My machine running Win10 LTSC is getting updates until 2029. I also have machines running Debian. There is no way I am installing the regular version of Win11. Its trash made to pander to greedy shareholders. If they take the garbage out for LTSC, I might run it.

        • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I guess there is no legal option for individuals because Microsoft only provides LTSC option for orgs. Most guides I saw in the internet just tell you to download some iso from google drive link. You might be able to download it from Microsoft here but I haven’t actually tested it because it asks you to register your info before proceeding. Then you’ll activate it using activator scripts such as MAS or buy some grey market keys on some keys site.

      • Whirling_Cloudburst@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        You can’t unless you form a small group like a non profit organization or a business. You can cheat the system legally going the NPO route as long as you find a way to fulfill legal requirements, but you need friends (it helps to know someone in law school too) and you have to do the legal paperwork and share all the cost. You could make a gamer NPO for example. The price to do this will vary depending on where you live. The price for the volume license can vary a lot depending on where you get it from. Where your group is located effects this. In my local it is about $200-400 USD per person.

        Your other alternative is the grey market. Its grey because it is legally ambiguous.

    • Haru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s such an awful site, and always surprises me when I see it being used/shared. Surely when it comes to tech there are better resources than a tabloid for it.

  • Mereo@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Your PC will soon be be junk if you do not want to try out Linux.