Most of them doesn’t even look that good like Rolex

  • shindarey@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m planning on getting a GS. I could just as easily go get a Rolex (with the availability exception) but I much prefer enjoying a good watch under the radar. Rarely anyone knows what a GS is but everyone knows a Rolex.

  • iBurley@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Looks aren’t everything. Watches can be used as a fashion accessory but they aren’t that exclusively. If you only want a watch for its general style, absolutely go with the less expensive one that looks similar. There’s a lot more to it than the style though.

    • Classic-Scarcity-804@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The information about the steel is incorrect though, 904L is softer than 316L. If they got that wrong I’m not putting much stock in the next 9 points.

  • Mawaqeet@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ok, it seems to me, it’s obvious from your question you probably never handled a luxury watch in person in a (5000$-10000$) segment.

    I tell you my opinion geniune opinion: Until 2021 I only owned a Seiko (150$) and a Timex (170¢) I still have the Timex.

    One time I decided to be a little bit braver and walked to Bucherer to try a luxury watch on my hand for first time in my life.

    The watch was just randomly a Tudor Pelagos 42 (black matte dial) up until this point I never handled a luxury watch in my life.

    The first impression was: 😳😯🫨🙆

    To translate it: Oh my God!!! This is so beautiful!!! I never seen a watch like this in person!!!

    To any untrained eye in watches, it’s extremely obvious the difference in build quality, aesthetics that a watch like the Pelagos was screaming (I am luxury) and this applies to other brands in that segment.

    I didn’t buy the watch (I didn’t have the money) at that time, but in my mind I said "oh wow I’d definitely trade 20 (150$) Seikos for this.

    It doesn’t mean Seiko is bad or Anything, we just talking about different quality segments even within Seiko. I’m pretty sure those Prospex are screaming luxury too due to their build quality.

    From that point, I sold my cheaper watches and I changed my mentality from (quantity) -> (quality).

    Bought a Grand Seiko, a Longines and a Hamilton and planning to buy a Breitling Navitimer beginning next year insha’Allah!

  • Classic-Scarcity-804@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A huge number of luxury watches have similar styles to more affordable options, they’re usually made to a significantly higher standard in terms of finishing, using movements developed in house (not necessarily better, but adds to cost due to R&D), better bracelets with comfort features like toolless quick adjusts, movements calibrated to a higher standard (COSC, METAS etc). It’s also worth noting that brands like Rolex are not considered to be high end in watch making, they’re machine finished and mass produced. You start to see more hand finishing in JLC (not all of them), Grand Seiko (not all of them), and then moving up VC, Patek, AP, A.Lange. And then you’ve got the ultra low number fully hand made stuff that I could only dream of being able to afford.

  • Cocainutella@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    9/10 customers do it for status, usually because of a name brand and bling. 1/10 do it to gasp at little mechanical marvels.