• aure__entuluva@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Someone else pointed this out, but the 2/5 were saying they wouldn’t have gotten VAR involved, meaning they thought it wasn’t a clear and obvious error, not that they didn’t think it was red card.

    The whole “clear and obvious” thing is a huge issue. Ironically, it will never have a clear definition.

    • chrismikehunt@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ok, but if they thought it was a red, and the ref didn’t give a red, that’s a clear and obvious error by proxy. If they didn’t think it was a clear and obvious error they cannot have thought he should have been sent off

      • Khaglist@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s just a completely pointless caveat that adds more confusion into the whole process.