Similar to Mastodon’s spikes last year, it seems. Anyways, there is data to think about. Source

  • Strangle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a new user, I kind of can’t get over the idea that bots just seem to scrape links and repost them here.

    That seems to be most of the contributions to communities to me.

    • Burp@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unpopular opinion: bots might be a good thing for now.
      I’m speaking from a growth perspective. Assuming users want to use social media to…socialize… you need active users and constant content. New social media platforms have a lack of users and content. Bots can bridge that gap until enough users are contributing and using the platform.
      If you really think about it, it comes down to a platform using bots effectively. Let’s say the bots will only submit content when user submitted content falls below a threshold. Maybe it will auto generate threads for breaking news.
      What if bots are used to ask questions and further conversations, like a social lubricant. Employed in a way to pull more useful information from users or to keep people engaged.
      This all hinges on the ability for a bot to appear real.

      This sounds super fucked when you think about it. I’m not a fan of bot content. If you didn’t know it was a bot, what difference would it make? LLM might be able to make it engaging and natural.

      • FuzzChef@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Imho that’s a horrible idea. A large part of content on the instance I’m on has become bots just reposting news articles without any own contribution, no discussion, nothing.