Its been a big debate.
Wade was for the most part the first option on his team while Scottie played second fiddle to Jordon for nearly his whole career. Wade has a higher scoring average and assist average for his entire career compared to Pippen and was the focal point of his team. But considering Pippen’s accolades.
2006 NBA Finals ends this debate
Exactly. Is it theoretically possible Pippen could have had a season like that as the best player on a team in his prime? Sure. But he didn’t, and based on what actually happened, Wade clears pretty easily.