• vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      What most people don’t seem to understand is that every Android phone is a Google phone unless you go through the degooglification.

      I would (and did) just use Apple phones if it weren’t for GrapheneOS.

    • sol@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Many do, and many want something else. Personally the uncertainty around banking apps working is what keeps me away from GrapheneOS.

    • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      And, like I said, that’s a niche.

      I’d love to use GrapheneOS myself, but unfortunately too many apps I need won’t work on it.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I haven’t found any apps that don’t work with the proper permissions enabled.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            Yes I do but no, that’s not correct, most apps in Play Store work fine without Play Services.

      • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        they could probably just extend it with the bits that google requires for corporate approval, and release that as a fork, while still contributing to the development of base graphene os.

        I mean they don’t need to use plain graphene, a partnership could make things easier for both parties by avoiding needless duplication of efforts.