As it turns out it doesn’t actually cost that much on regular transit, there’s an AIRPORT SURCHARGE because it’s an “airport train”.

No wonder Americans don’t use public transit, even when the system exists it’s ridiculously difficult and expensive to use.

Source

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Isn’t the idea of such a surcharge to encourage an alternate transit mode?

    Apparently they believe they don’t have enough taxis clogging the entrance? Every driver trying to reach my local airport should thank me for taking the airport shuttle.

    • stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      I don’t know if I used the right term by saying “surcharge”. They built an extraordinarily expensive trolley line from BART to the airport about ten years back and are charging high fees to cover expenses.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oakland_Airport_Connector

      The San Francisco Airport, on the other hand, has an actual surcharge - the main BART line goes direct to SFO but they charge like $5 extra. But SFO also has the same surcharge on taxis and rideshares :/